Skip to content

Conversation

@MyvTsv
Copy link
Contributor

@MyvTsv MyvTsv commented Mar 13, 2025

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have added tests (when available) that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG with a short functional description of the fix or new feature.
  • This change requires a documentation update.

Description

  • It fixes !36795
  • The operator is not had the same behavior as the operator is in the search options for multiple choice dropdown

Capture d’écran du 2025-03-14 10-09-00

Capture d’écran du 2025-03-14 10-09-57

@MyvTsv MyvTsv self-assigned this Mar 13, 2025
@MyvTsv MyvTsv requested review from Rom1-B and stonebuzz March 13, 2025 12:32
MyvTsv and others added 3 commits March 14, 2025 09:35
Co-authored-by: Stanislas <skita@teclib.com>
@MyvTsv MyvTsv requested a review from stonebuzz March 14, 2025 09:00
@MyvTsv MyvTsv marked this pull request as ready for review March 14, 2025 09:05
@stonebuzz
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MyvTsv
can you validate with customers ?

Best regards

Co-authored-by: Stanislas <skita@teclib.com>
@stonebuzz stonebuzz added the bug label Mar 20, 2025
@stonebuzz stonebuzz self-requested a review March 20, 2025 09:05
@Rom1-B Rom1-B merged commit 5af8b09 into pluginsGLPI:main Mar 20, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants