Skip to content

Conversation

@CoMPaTech
Copy link
Member

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech commented Dec 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Added reconfiguration capabilities for the Plugwise integration, allowing users to update settings while retaining existing credentials.
    • Introduced new error handling messages for various scenarios, enhancing user guidance during configuration.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced organization and clarity of configuration flow and entity management for binary sensors, buttons, climate controls, numbers, selects, sensors, and switches.
    • Improved error handling and validation processes across multiple components.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues related to invalid input scenarios and improved error messages for better user experience.
  • Documentation

    • Updated changelog to reflect recent changes and version updates.
  • Version Update

    • Updated integration version from 0.55.4 to 0.55.5.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces comprehensive enhancements to the Plugwise integration in Home Assistant, focusing on configuration flow management, error handling, and entity management. The changes span multiple files, including config_flow.py, strings.json, and various platform-specific files like binary_sensor.py, button.py, and sensor.py. The primary objectives include improving reconfiguration capabilities, centralizing error handling, and streamlining entity addition processes across different platforms.

Changes

File Change Summary
custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py Added async_step_reconfigure, verify_connection methods; renamed base_schema to smile_user_schema; introduced SMILE_RECONF_SCHEMA
custom_components/plugwise/strings.json Added reconfiguration step, new abort conditions, exceptions section
custom_components/plugwise/entity.py Removed async_added_to_hass method
custom_components/plugwise/binary_sensor.py Enhanced entity setup, added notification handling
custom_components/plugwise/button.py Updated entity addition logic
custom_components/plugwise/climate.py Refined HVAC mode and preset handling
custom_components/plugwise/coordinator.py Improved error message translations
custom_components/plugwise/number.py Introduced entity description classes and setup logic
custom_components/plugwise/select.py Enhanced entity management for select options
custom_components/plugwise/sensor.py Improved organization of sensor descriptions and setup
custom_components/plugwise/switch.py Streamlined addition of switch entities
custom_components/plugwise/util.py Updated error handling in plugwise_command decorator
tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py Added tests for reconfiguration flow
tests/components/plugwise/test_number.py Added validation test for temperature offset
tests/components/plugwise/test_select.py Added test for unavailable regulation mode selection
CHANGELOG.md Updated for new version releases
custom_components/plugwise/manifest.json Updated version number from "0.55.4" to "0.55.5"

Possibly related PRs

Suggested Labels

enhancement, needs_upstreaming, bug, core-dev-compat

Suggested Reviewers

  • bouwew

Poem

🐰 Plugwise Rabbit's Configuration Dance

In Home Assistant's garden so bright,
Reconfiguration takes its flight,
With schemas clean and errors neat,
Our integration's now a treat!

Hop, hop, config flow so fine! 🎉


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 94544cd and 36f6c68.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • custom_components/plugwise/manifest.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • custom_components/plugwise/manifest.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff2f0d8 and abbaa22.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (2 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (2)

21-27: LGTM! Well-structured reconfiguration step.

The new reconfiguration step is well-defined and properly uses dynamic placeholders for both the description and data fields.


34-35: LGTM! Consistent use of placeholders.

Good improvement replacing static strings with common config flow data placeholders, ensuring consistency with the reconfigure step.

custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (2)

44-44: LGTM! Appropriate import.

The TextSelector import is appropriate for the host field input.


256-305: Verify integration with the rest of the codebase.

Let's verify the integration of the reconfiguration flow:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Reconfiguration flow is properly integrated and error handling is complete

  • All error messages used in async_step_reconfigure are properly defined in strings.json
  • The reconfiguration flow is well integrated with validate_input function
  • Error handling uses standard Plugwise exceptions imported from the plugwise library
  • The flow properly handles configuration updates through async_update_reload_and_abort
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify error messages and integration points

# Check if all error messages used in async_step_reconfigure are defined in strings.json
echo "Checking error messages..."
rg -A 1 '"error": {' custom_components/plugwise/strings.json

# Check for any existing reconfigure flow triggers
echo "Checking reconfigure flow triggers..."
rg -A 5 "async_step_reconfigure"

Length of output: 815


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the regex and check for error messages and other integration points

# Check error messages in strings.json
echo "Checking error messages in strings.json..."
cat custom_components/plugwise/strings.json

# Check for validate_input usage and implementation
echo "Checking validate_input implementation..."
rg -A 10 "async def validate_input" custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py

# Check for other references to reconfigure
echo "Checking reconfigure references..."
rg "reconfigure" custom_components/plugwise/

# Check for the exceptions being used
echo "Checking exception definitions..."
rg "class.*Error" custom_components/plugwise/

Length of output: 10512


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the exception definitions and _get_reconfigure_entry implementation

# Check for exception definitions in exceptions.py or similar
echo "Checking for exception definitions..."
fd exceptions.py
cat custom_components/plugwise/exceptions.py

# Check for _get_reconfigure_entry implementation
echo "Checking _get_reconfigure_entry implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'def _get_reconfigure_entry(self)' custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py -A 10

# Check for any imports of the exceptions
echo "Checking exception imports..."
rg "from.*exceptions import" custom_components/plugwise/

Length of output: 1167

@CoMPaTech
Copy link
Member Author

Not intended to be working yet, needs more tinkering

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (2)

289-306: Maintain consistency in selector usage

The form schema uses TextSelector only for the host field but not for other text fields. This creates an inconsistent user experience.

Consider using appropriate selectors for all fields:

                 {
                     vol.Required(
                         CONF_HOST,
                         default=reconfigure_entry.data.get(CONF_HOST),
                     ): TextSelector(),
                     vol.Required(
                         CONF_PORT,
                         default=reconfigure_entry.data.get(CONF_PORT),
                     ): vol.Coerce(int),
                     vol.Required(
                         CONF_PASSWORD,
                         default=reconfigure_entry.data.get(CONF_PASSWORD),
-                    ): str,
+                    ): TextSelector(password=True),
                     vol.Required(
                         CONF_USERNAME,
                         default=reconfigure_entry.data.get(CONF_USERNAME),
                     ): vol.In({SMILE: FLOW_SMILE, STRETCH: FLOW_STRETCH})
                 }

261-275: Enhance error handling

The error handling is comprehensive but could be improved by adding more specific error messages for different scenarios.

Consider adding more specific error messages:

             try:
                 api = await validate_input(self.hass, user_input)
             except ConnectionFailedError:
-                errors[CONF_BASE] = "cannot_connect"
+                errors[CONF_HOST] = "cannot_connect"
             except InvalidAuthentication:
-                errors[CONF_BASE] = "invalid_auth"
+                errors[CONF_PASSWORD] = "invalid_auth"
             except InvalidSetupError:
                 errors[CONF_BASE] = "invalid_setup"
             except (InvalidXMLError, ResponseError):
                 errors[CONF_BASE] = "response_error"
             except UnsupportedDeviceError:
                 errors[CONF_BASE] = "unsupported"
             except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001
+                _LOGGER.exception("Unexpected exception")
                 errors[CONF_BASE] = "unknown"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between abbaa22 and d9cf07f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (1)

256-312: Verify integration reload behavior

The reconfiguration process uses async_update_reload_and_abort which will reload the integration. We need to ensure this doesn't cause issues with existing devices.

Let's verify the integration reload behavior:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the device handling and cleanup process:


Based on the analysis of the code, I can now provide a final response:

Integration reload behavior is safely handled

The integration implements proper cleanup and reload mechanisms:

  • The async_unload_entry function correctly unloads all platforms using async_unload_platforms
  • Each platform properly handles device cleanup through async_on_unload callbacks
  • The coordinator pattern ensures proper state management during reloads
  • Entities are properly managed through the coordinator's listener pattern
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any device state handling during reload
rg -A 5 "async_update_reload_and_abort|async_reload" custom_components/plugwise/

# Check for any cleanup methods that should be called during reload
ast-grep --pattern 'async def async_unload_entry($$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1159


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for platform setup and cleanup
rg -A 10 "async_setup_entry" custom_components/plugwise/

# Check how devices are managed
ast-grep --pattern 'class Coordinator($_) {
  $$$
}'

# Look for any device cleanup or state management
rg -A 5 "coordinator" custom_components/plugwise/

Length of output: 50846

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech changed the title Try reconfigure Catchup core quality changes Dec 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
custom_components/plugwise/quality_scale.yaml (1)

1-85: Maintain Consistent Comment Formatting for Readability

Consider standardizing the formatting of comments and statuses to enhance readability. Ensure that all comments are consistently capitalized and punctuated.

custom_components/plugwise/translations/en.json (1)

6-6: Consider clarifying the error message.

The message "The configured Smile ID does not match the Smile ID on the requested IP address." could be more user-friendly. Consider: "This device has a different ID than the one being reconfigured. Please ensure you're connecting to the correct device."

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d9cf07f and d090527.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (2 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/entity.py (0 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/quality_scale.yaml (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (2 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/translations/en.json (1 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/conftest.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/fixtures/m_adam_cooling/all_data.json (5 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • custom_components/plugwise/entity.py
🔇 Additional comments (8)
tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py (1)

465-541: New Test Functions Enhance Reconfiguration Flow Coverage

The added test functions _start_reconfigure_flow, test_reconfigure_flow, test_reconfigure_flow_other_smile, and test_reconfigure_flow_errors are well-implemented and cover various scenarios for the reconfiguration flow. This improves the overall test coverage and robustness of the configuration process.

tests/components/plugwise/fixtures/m_adam_cooling/all_data.json (1)

76-76: Data Updates and Formatting Improvements are Correct

The updates to the JSON data, including formatting adjustments and changes to attribute values such as control_state, are appropriate and correctly applied.

Also applies to: 151-151, 165-165, 180-180, 184-184, 198-199

custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (1)

21-27: Verify Localization Placeholders for Correctness

Ensure that the localization placeholders like [%key:common::config_flow::data::ip%] and [%key:common::config_flow::abort::reconfigure_successful%] are correctly defined and will resolve properly during runtime to display the intended text.

Also applies to: 34-35, 52-54

tests/components/plugwise/conftest.py (1)

101-109: LGTM! Good test coverage improvement.

The additional patch ensures consistent mocking of the Smile class across both coordinator and config_flow modules, which is essential for properly testing the new reconfiguration functionality.

custom_components/plugwise/translations/en.json (1)

22-27: LGTM! Well-structured configuration form.

The reconfiguration form's translation entries are clear and include all necessary fields with appropriate descriptions.

custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (3)

248-304: LGTM! Reconfiguration implementation looks good.

The implementation includes proper error handling, validation, and form generation. The schema now correctly handles all required fields with appropriate types.


269-272: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize unique ID validation.

The unique ID validation should happen before the API call to prevent unnecessary network requests.

Move the unique ID validation before the API call:

        if user_input:
+            reconfigure_entry = self._get_reconfigure_entry()
+            await self.async_set_unique_id(
+                reconfigure_entry.unique_id,
+                raise_on_progress=False
+            )
+            self._abort_if_unique_id_mismatch(reason="not_the_same_smile")
            try:
                api = await validate_input(self.hass, user_input)

274-274: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add missing method implementation.

The code calls self._get_reconfigure_entry() but this method is not implemented.

Add the following implementation:

def _get_reconfigure_entry(self) -> ConfigEntry:
    """Get the config entry being reconfigured."""
    assert self.hass
    entry_id = self.context.get("entry_id")
    if entry_id is None:
        raise ValueError("No entry_id in context")
    return self.hass.config_entries.async_get_entry(entry_id)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
custom_components/plugwise/sensor.py (2)

Line range hint 126-132: Remove commented-out code to enhance readability

Consider removing the commented-out list comprehension in async_setup_entry. Keeping old code can reduce code clarity and may cause confusion.


Line range hint 134-145: Efficient entity initialization with logging

The explicit loop with logging in _add_entities improves debuggability. Ensure that debug logs are appropriately set and consider adjusting the logging level or removing them if they are no longer needed.

custom_components/plugwise/button.py (2)

Line range hint 25-31: Remove commented-out code to enhance readability

Consider removing the commented-out code in async_setup_entry to maintain a clean codebase and avoid potential confusion.


Line range hint 33-38: Clear and explicit entity setup with logging

The explicit loop for adding entities with debug logging aids in troubleshooting. Ensure that logging is configured appropriately for production.

custom_components/plugwise/select.py (1)

Line range hint 83-103: Temporary debugging code needs cleanup before production.

Similar to the switch component, this implementation replaces a concise list comprehension with a verbose loop for debugging. While helpful during development, it should be reverted to the original implementation before merging to production.

Consider reverting to the commented-out upstream version:

-        entities: list[PlugwiseSelectEntity] = []
-        for device_id in coordinator.new_devices:
-            device = coordinator.data.devices[device_id]
-            for description in SELECT_TYPES:
-                if description.options_key in device:
-                    entities.append(
-                        PlugwiseSelectEntity(coordinator, device_id, description)
-                    )
-                    LOGGER.debug(
-                        "Add %s %s selector", device["name"], description.translation_key
-                    )
-        async_add_entities(entities)
+        async_add_entities(
+            PlugwiseSelectEntity(coordinator, device_id, description)
+            for device_id in coordinator.new_devices
+            for description in SELECT_TYPES
+            if description.options_key in coordinator.data.devices[device_id]
+        )
custom_components/plugwise/number.py (3)

Line range hint 34-63: Consider consistent naming convention for NUMBER_TYPES

The comment "Upstream + is there a reason we didn't rename this one prefixed?" suggests inconsistency in naming conventions. Consider prefixing this constant with PLUGWISE_ to maintain consistency with other constants in the codebase.

-NUMBER_TYPES = (
+PLUGWISE_NUMBER_TYPES = (

Line range hint 65-102: Consider consolidating upstream and debug implementations

The current implementation maintains two versions of the same logic (one commented out). This could lead to maintenance issues. Consider:

  1. Using a debug flag to toggle detailed logging
  2. Integrating logging into the upstream implementation
  3. Adding comments explaining why the alternative implementation is needed
 async def async_setup_entry(
     hass: HomeAssistant,
     entry: PlugwiseConfigEntry,
     async_add_entities: AddEntitiesCallback,
 ) -> None:
     """Set up Plugwise number platform from a config entry."""
     coordinator = entry.runtime_data
 
     @callback
     def _add_entities() -> None:
         """Add Entities."""
         if not coordinator.new_devices:
             return
 
-        # Upstream consts
-        # async_add_entities(
-        #     PlugwiseNumberEntity(coordinator, device_id, description)
-        #     for device_id in coordinator.new_devices
-        #     for description in NUMBER_TYPES
-        #     if description.key in coordinator.data.devices[device_id]
-        # )
-
-        # pw-beta alternative for debugging
         entities: list[PlugwiseNumberEntity] = []
         for device_id in coordinator.new_devices:
             device = coordinator.data.devices[device_id]
             for description in NUMBER_TYPES:
                 if description.key in device:
                     entity = PlugwiseNumberEntity(coordinator, device_id, description)
                     entities.append(entity)
                     LOGGER.debug(
                         "Add %s %s number",
                         device["name"],
                         description.translation_key,
                     )
 
         async_add_entities(entities)

Line range hint 105-124: Consider extracting magic number

The value 0.5 used for the minimum step size should be extracted as a named constant for better maintainability and clarity.

+MIN_STEP_SIZE = 0.5
+
 class PlugwiseNumberEntity(PlugwiseEntity, NumberEntity):
     # ...
     native_step = self.device[description.key][RESOLUTION]
     if description.key != TEMPERATURE_OFFSET:
-        native_step = max(native_step, 0.5)
+        native_step = max(native_step, MIN_STEP_SIZE)
custom_components/plugwise/coordinator.py (1)

100-124: Address TODO comment regarding error message formatting

The TODO comment indicates uncertainty about including the error message in translations. Consider:

  1. Documenting the decision about error message inclusion
  2. Ensuring consistent error handling across all exceptions
  3. Adding the error details to the log for debugging purposes
 except (InvalidXMLError, ResponseError) as err:
+    LOGGER.debug("XML/Response error details: %s", err)
     raise UpdateFailed(
         translation_domain=DOMAIN,
         translation_key="invalid_xml_data",
     ) from err
custom_components/plugwise/binary_sensor.py (1)

Line range hint 147-199: Consider improving notification handling structure

The notification handling logic could be improved by:

  1. Extracting notification creation to a separate method
  2. Adding error handling for notification creation
  3. Using a more type-safe approach for severity handling
+    def _create_notification(self, notify_id: str, message: str) -> None:
+        """Create a persistent notification with error handling."""
+        try:
+            pn.async_create(
+                self.hass,
+                message,
+                "Plugwise Notification:",
+                f"{DOMAIN}.{notify_id}"
+            )
+        except Exception as err:
+            LOGGER.error("Failed to create notification: %s", err)

     @property
     def extra_state_attributes(self) -> Mapping[str, Any] | None:
         """Return entity specific state attributes."""
         if self.entity_description.key != PLUGWISE_NOTIFICATION:
             return None

         attrs: dict[str, list[str]] = {}
         self._notification = {}
         if notify := self.coordinator.data.gateway[NOTIFICATIONS]:
             for notify_id, details in notify.items():
                 for msg_type, msg in details.items():
                     msg_type = msg_type.lower()
                     if msg_type not in SEVERITIES:
                         msg_type = "other"

                     attrs.setdefault(f"{msg_type}_msg", []).append(msg)
                     self._notification[notify_id] = f"{msg_type.title()}: {msg}"

         return attrs
custom_components/plugwise/climate.py (1)

Line range hint 215-242: Enhance documentation for previous action mode tracking.

The _previous_action_mode method's purpose and behavior could be better documented. Consider adding more detailed docstring explaining:

  • When and why the previous mode is tracked
  • The conditions for updating the previous mode
  • The implications for HVAC control
tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py (3)

465-481: Enhance the helper function's docstring

While the function is well-structured, consider enhancing its docstring to include:

  • Parameter descriptions
  • Return value description
  • Example usage
 async def _start_reconfigure_flow(
     hass: HomeAssistant,
     mock_config_entry: MockConfigEntry,
     host_ip: str,
 ) -> ConfigFlowResult:
-    """Initialize a reconfigure flow."""
+    """Initialize a reconfigure flow for testing.
+
+    Args:
+        hass: HomeAssistant instance
+        mock_config_entry: The mock config entry to reconfigure
+        host_ip: The new host IP address to configure
+
+    Returns:
+        ConfigFlowResult from the reconfigure flow
+
+    Example:
+        result = await _start_reconfigure_flow(hass, mock_config_entry, "1.1.1.1")
+        assert result["type"] is FlowResultType.ABORT
+    """

483-541: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage for reconfiguration flow

The test cases are well-structured and cover the main scenarios:

  • Successful reconfiguration
  • Smile ID mismatch
  • Various error conditions

Consider adding these additional test cases for completeness:

  1. Test with invalid host format
  2. Test with same host (no-op reconfiguration)

Example test case:

async def test_reconfigure_flow_same_host(
    hass: HomeAssistant,
    mock_smile_adam: AsyncMock,
    mock_setup_entry: AsyncMock,
    mock_config_entry: MockConfigEntry,
) -> None:
    """Test reconfigure flow with same host."""
    # Use the existing host from mock_config_entry
    result = await _start_reconfigure_flow(
        hass,
        mock_config_entry,
        mock_config_entry.data[CONF_HOST],
    )

    assert result["type"] is FlowResultType.ABORT
    assert result["reason"] == "no_changes"

465-541: Consider separating reconfiguration tests into a new test class

As the reconfiguration tests grow, consider moving them into a dedicated test class (e.g., TestPlugwiseReconfigureFlow) to improve organization and maintainability. This would:

  • Better isolate reconfiguration test scenarios
  • Make it easier to add more reconfiguration-specific test cases
  • Improve test discovery and reporting
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d090527 and 571dd56.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • custom_components/plugwise/binary_sensor.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/button.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/climate.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (4 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/coordinator.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/number.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/select.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/sensor.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (3 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/switch.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/util.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_number.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_select.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (18)
custom_components/plugwise/sensor.py (2)

86-86: Adding PARALLEL_UPDATES for concurrency control

The addition of PARALLEL_UPDATES = 0 effectively removes throttling, allowing all sensor entities to update in parallel, which can improve performance.


Line range hint 172-176: native_value property implemented correctly

The native_value property accurately retrieves the sensor value based on the sensor key, ensuring correct data representation.

custom_components/plugwise/util.py (2)

12-12: Importing DOMAIN for translation context

The import of DOMAIN from .const is necessary for setting the translation domain in the error handling, enabling localized error messages.


35-42: Enhanced error handling with localization support

The updated exception handling now provides localized error messages using translation_domain, translation_key, and translation_placeholders, improving user experience.

custom_components/plugwise/button.py (1)

20-20: Adding PARALLEL_UPDATES for concurrency control

Setting PARALLEL_UPDATES = 0 allows button entities to update without throttling, which is appropriate given their minimal performance impact.

tests/components/plugwise/test_select.py (2)

14-14: Importing ServiceValidationError for exception handling in tests

The import of ServiceValidationError is necessary for testing invalid service calls and ensuring proper error handling.


92-106: New test for handling invalid regulation mode

The test_adam_select_unavailable_regulation_mode function correctly verifies that selecting an unavailable option raises a ServiceValidationError, ensuring robust error handling in the integration.

tests/components/plugwise/test_number.py (1)

103-116: LGTM! Well-structured test case for boundary validation.

The test properly validates that out-of-bounds temperature offset values raise the expected ServiceValidationError. Good addition to complement the existing temperature offset tests.

custom_components/plugwise/switch.py (1)

Line range hint 83-102: Temporary debugging code needs cleanup before production.

The current implementation replaces the more concise list comprehension with a verbose loop for debugging purposes. While this is helpful during development, it should be reverted to the original implementation before merging to production.

Consider reverting to the commented-out upstream version:

-        entities: list[PlugwiseSwitchEntity] = []
-        for device_id in coordinator.new_devices:
-            device = coordinator.data.devices[device_id]
-            if not (switches := device.get(SWITCHES)):
-                continue
-            for description in PLUGWISE_SWITCHES:
-                if description.key not in switches:
-                    continue
-                entities.append(PlugwiseSwitchEntity(coordinator, device_id, description))
-                LOGGER.debug(
-                    "Add %s %s switch", device["name"], description.translation_key
-                )
-        async_add_entities(entities)
+        async_add_entities(
+            PlugwiseSwitchEntity(coordinator, device_id, description)
+            for device_id in coordinator.new_devices
+            if (switches := coordinator.data.devices[device_id].get(SWITCHES))
+            for description in PLUGWISE_SWITCHES
+            if description.key in switches
+        )
custom_components/plugwise/select.py (1)

Line range hint 47-47: Address the naming convention question in the comment.

The comment raises a question about naming convention: "is there a reason we didn't rename this one prefixed?". This should be addressed before merging.

Run the following to check naming patterns across the codebase:

custom_components/plugwise/binary_sensor.py (1)

Line range hint 109-146: Similar code duplication issue as in number.py

The pattern of maintaining both upstream and debug implementations appears here as well. Consider applying the same solution as suggested for number.py to maintain consistency across the codebase.

custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (2)

305-324: LGTM! Well-structured error messages.

The new exceptions section provides clear and specific error messages for various failure scenarios.


34-35: ⚠️ Potential issue

Replace dynamic placeholders with static text in user step.

Dynamic placeholders don't work in custom components.

Apply this diff:

-          "host": "[%key:common::config_flow::data::ip%]",
-          "port": "[%key:common::config_flow::data::port%]"
+          "host": "IP-address",
+          "port": "Port number"
custom_components/plugwise/climate.py (1)

62-62: LGTM! Prevents concurrent updates.

Setting PARALLEL_UPDATES = 0 ensures that updates are processed sequentially, which is important for maintaining consistency when communicating with the Plugwise device.

custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (3)

216-242: LGTM! Well-structured connection verification.

The _verify_connection helper method effectively encapsulates the connection validation logic and error handling.


108-119: ⚠️ Potential issue

Port field should use vol.Coerce(int) instead of TextSelector.

The port field should be an integer input to ensure valid port numbers.

Apply this diff:

            vol.Required(
                CONF_PORT, default=reconfigure_data.get(CONF_PORT)
-            ): TextSelector(),
+            ): vol.Coerce(int),

267-299: ⚠️ Potential issue

Critical issues in reconfiguration implementation.

Several issues need to be addressed:

  1. Missing required fields: password and username
  2. Missing type hints for self._get_reconfigure_entry()
  3. The unique ID validation should happen before the API call

Please refer to the past review comments for the detailed fixes.

tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py (1)

23-23: LGTM: New imports and constants are properly added

The new import and constant are necessary for the new test cases and are placed appropriately in the file.

Also applies to: 47-48

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (1)

305-324: Consider consolidating duplicate error messages.

While the exceptions section is well-structured, there's duplication with existing error messages in the "error" section:

  • "Failed to connect" exists in both sections
  • "Invalid XML data..." is similar to "response_error"
  • "Device with unsupported firmware" matches "unsupported"

Consider consolidating these messages to maintain a single source of truth and prevent potential inconsistencies.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 571dd56 and 5d65383.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (2)

21-27: LGTM! Correctly uses static text for configuration fields.

The implementation properly uses static text for host and port fields, which is the recommended approach for custom components. The structure follows Home Assistant's configuration flow patterns.


52-54: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive abort conditions.

The abort messages are well-defined and cover important edge cases:

  • Detection of both Anna and Adam devices
  • Smile ID mismatch during reconfiguration
  • Successful reconfiguration confirmation

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/components/plugwise/test_select.py (1)

91-105: Enable the commented test for error handling validation.

The commented-out test test_adam_select_unavailable_regulation_mode is important for validating error handling when selecting invalid regulation modes. Please uncomment and enable this test.

Apply this diff to enable the test:

-#async def test_anna_select_unavailable_regulation_mode(
-#    hass: HomeAssistant, mock_smile_anna: MagicMock, init_integration: MockConfigEntry
-#) -> None:
-#    """Test a regulation_mode non-available preset."""
-#
-#    with pytest.raises(ServiceValidationError, match="valid options"):
-#        await hass.services.async_call(
-#            SELECT_DOMAIN,
-#            SERVICE_SELECT_OPTION,
-#            {
-#                ATTR_ENTITY_ID: "select.anna_thermostat_schedule",
-#                ATTR_OPTION: "freezing",
-#            },
-#            blocking=True,
-#        )
+async def test_anna_select_unavailable_regulation_mode(
+    hass: HomeAssistant, mock_smile_anna: MagicMock, init_integration: MockConfigEntry
+) -> None:
+    """Test a regulation_mode non-available preset."""
+
+    with pytest.raises(ServiceValidationError, match="valid options"):
+        await hass.services.async_call(
+            SELECT_DOMAIN,
+            SERVICE_SELECT_OPTION,
+            {
+                ATTR_ENTITY_ID: "select.anna_thermostat_schedule",
+                ATTR_OPTION: "freezing",
+            },
+            blocking=True,
+        )
custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (1)

74-79: Enhance schema with TextSelector for better UX.

Consider using TextSelector for the host field to provide a better user experience.

Apply this diff:

 SMILE_RECONF_SCHEMA = vol.Schema(
     {
-        vol.Required(CONF_HOST): str,
+        vol.Required(CONF_HOST): TextSelector(),
         vol.Optional(CONF_PORT, default=DEFAULT_PORT): int,
     }
 )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d65383 and 55ffd6b.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (3 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/translations/en.json (1 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_select.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
custom_components/plugwise/translations/en.json (1)

2-331: LGTM! Comprehensive and well-structured translations.

The translations are clear, user-friendly, and provide helpful error messages and descriptions for all components.

custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (3)

208-231: LGTM! Well-structured error handling.

The _verify_connection helper method is well-implemented with comprehensive error handling and clear return types.


259-295: ⚠️ Potential issue

Critical issues in reconfiguration implementation.

Several issues need to be addressed in the reconfiguration implementation:

  1. Missing type hints for _get_reconfigure_entry()
  2. Unique ID validation should happen before API call
  3. Missing required fields: password and username

The issues have been previously identified in past reviews. Please refer to the existing comments for the suggested fixes.


281-281: Verify the unique ID mismatch handling.

The error message "not_the_same_smile" is used when the unique ID doesn't match. Let's verify this behavior.

✅ Verification successful

Unique ID mismatch handling is properly implemented with clear error messaging

The error message "not_the_same_smile" is correctly defined in the English translation file with a clear and descriptive message: "The configured Smile ID does not match the Smile ID on the requested IP address."

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the error message translation exists and is properly defined

# Test: Check if the error message is defined in translations
rg -A 1 "not_the_same_smile" custom_components/plugwise/translations/

Length of output: 350

@bouwew
Copy link
Contributor

bouwew commented Dec 13, 2024

@CoMPaTech your last commit reverses the extra logic I added to async_step_user().
I changed the logic so that:

  • Empty input fields are show when the user manually adds the integration. The idea was also that the input fields would show the data from discovery but I think that's not working. Maybe that can work if the logic is changed a little.
  • When the user has entered data with a typo, the validation fails and the "enter data" window is shown with the data the user had entered before, including the typo, lines 233-238 should achieve that.

You should be able to keep the existing logic and add the reconfigure stuff?

@CoMPaTech
Copy link
Member Author

@CoMPaTech your last commit reverses the extra logic I added to async_step_user(). I changed the logic so that:

  • Empty input fields are show when the user manually adds the integration. The idea was also that the input fields would show the data from discovery but I think that's not working. Maybe that can work if the logic is changed a little.
  • When the user has entered data with a typo, the validation fails and the "enter data" window is shown with the data the user had entered before, including the typo, lines 233-238 should achieve that.

You should be able to keep the existing logic and add the reconfigure stuff?

Given the hint of suggested_values - I guess we could just solve that by rewriting the last part of the user_step to something like - saving both the 'if errors' (as it falls through anyway) and a second call to show form. We should also add a test for that to ensure we don't forget it next time tinkering. Not sure if suggested would also work for user_step though.

         return self.async_show_form(
             step_id=SOURCE_USER,
-            data_schema=SMILE_USER_SCHEMA(self.discovery_info),
+            data_schema=self.add_suggested_values_to_schema(
+                data_schema=SMILE_USER_SCHEMA(self.discovery_info),
+                suggested_values=self.discovery_info | user_input,
+            ),
             errors=errors,
         )

Thinking about the above and looking back at 233-238 - that might as well just be achievable even cleaner in the last call using

-            data_schema=SMILE_USER_SCHEMA(self.discovery_info),
+           data_schema=SMILE_USER_SCHEMA(self.discovery_info | user_input)

But both would need some tinkering to draft out the None type handling. Or maybe better, just hand-off both discovery and user_input to SMILE_USER_SCHEMA and let it figure it out (which might be more human readable than a | b or a | (b or {}) constructs (see vallox or brother takes on suggested values).

Couldn't get it to work right away, but wasn't too keen on merging this PR soon without proper cleanup anyway.

@bouwew
Copy link
Contributor

bouwew commented Dec 13, 2024

Interesting! Let's tinker a bit more during the weekend!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
custom_components/plugwise/quality_scale.yaml (1)

18-23: Consider tracking documentation TODOs in GitHub issues

Multiple documentation tasks are marked as "todo" and reference PR #36087. To ensure better tracking and visibility, consider creating GitHub issues for each documentation task.

Would you like me to help create GitHub issues for tracking these documentation tasks?

custom_components/plugwise/climate.py (1)

59-59: Consider documenting PARALLEL_UPDATES

The PARALLEL_UPDATES = 0 setting might need documentation explaining its purpose and impact.

Also applies to: 60-60

custom_components/plugwise/translations/en.json (1)

312-315: Document beta features clearly

The beta features in options should be clearly documented:

  • HomeKit emulation
  • Refresh interval
  • Scan interval

Consider adding:

  1. Documentation about feature stability
  2. Migration path from beta to stable
  3. Impact of these settings
custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (2)

74-79: Add input validation for the host field.

Consider adding validation for the host field to ensure it's a valid IP address or hostname.

 SMILE_RECONF_SCHEMA = vol.Schema(
     {
-        vol.Required(CONF_HOST): str,
+        vol.Required(CONF_HOST): vol.All(str, vol.Length(min=1), vol.Match(r"^[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+$")),
         vol.Optional(CONF_PORT, default=DEFAULT_PORT): int,
     }
 )

259-295: Consider persisting error states during reconfiguration.

When validation fails, the form is redisplayed but the user's input is lost. Consider preserving the input values when showing the form with errors.

         return self.async_show_form(
             step_id="reconfigure",
             data_schema=self.add_suggested_values_to_schema(
                 data_schema=SMILE_RECONF_SCHEMA,
-                suggested_values=reconfigure_entry.data,
+                suggested_values=user_input or reconfigure_entry.data,
             ),
             description_placeholders={"title": reconfigure_entry.title},
             errors=errors,
         )
tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py (1)

483-513: Add test coverage for port reconfiguration.

Consider adding a test case to verify that port changes are handled correctly during reconfiguration.

async def test_reconfigure_flow_with_port(
    hass: HomeAssistant,
    mock_smile_adam: AsyncMock,
    mock_setup_entry: AsyncMock,
    mock_config_entry: MockConfigEntry,
) -> None:
    """Test reconfigure flow with port change."""
    result = await _start_reconfigure_flow(
        hass, 
        mock_config_entry, 
        TEST_HOST, 
        port=8080
    )

    assert result["type"] is FlowResultType.ABORT
    assert result["reason"] == "reconfigure_successful"

    entry = hass.config_entries.async_get_entry(mock_config_entry.entry_id)
    assert entry
    assert entry.data.get(CONF_PORT) == 8080
custom_components/plugwise/sensor.py (2)

86-86: Document the PARALLEL_UPDATES setting.

Add a comment explaining why parallel updates are disabled to help future maintainers understand the decision.

+# Disable parallel updates to prevent potential race conditions with the Plugwise API
 PARALLEL_UPDATES = 0

Line range hint 449-465: Remove commented code and improve logging.

The commented code block should be removed since it's been replaced with the new implementation. Also, consider using f-strings for logging for better readability.

-        # Upstream consts
-        # async_add_entities(
-        #     PlugwiseSensorEntity(coordinator, device_id, description)
-        #     for device_id in coordinator.new_devices
-        #     if (sensors := coordinator.data.devices[device_id].get(SENSORS))
-        #     for description in PLUGWISE_SENSORS
-        #     if description.key in sensors
-        # )
         entities: list[PlugwiseSensorEntity] = []
         for device_id in coordinator.new_devices:
             device = coordinator.data.devices[device_id]
             if not (sensors := device.get(SENSORS)):
                 continue
             for description in PLUGWISE_SENSORS:
                 if description.key not in sensors:
                     continue
                 entities.append(PlugwiseSensorEntity(coordinator, device_id, description))
                 LOGGER.debug(
-                    "Add %s %s sensor", device["name"], description.translation_key or description.key
+                    f"Adding {device['name']} {description.translation_key or description.key} sensor"
                 )
custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (2)

52-54: Consider making the "not_the_same_smile" message more user-friendly.

While the messages are functionally correct, the "not_the_same_smile" message could be more user-friendly.

Consider this alternative:

-      "not_the_same_smile": "The configured Smile ID does not match the Smile ID on the requested IP address.",
+      "not_the_same_smile": "This appears to be a different Plugwise device than the one currently configured. Please check the IP address.",

305-324: Consider making error messages more actionable.

While the error messages are clear, some could be more helpful by including troubleshooting steps.

Consider these improvements:

     "authentication_failed": {
-      "message": "Invalid authentication"
+      "message": "Invalid authentication. Please verify your username and ID."
     },
     "data_incomplete_or_missing": {
-      "message": "Data incomplete or missing."
+      "message": "Required data is incomplete or missing. Please fill in all fields."
     },
     "failed_to_connect": {
-      "message": "Failed to connect"
+      "message": "Failed to connect. Please check if the device is powered on and accessible on your network."
     },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 55ffd6b and 5133e27.

📒 Files selected for processing (18)
  • custom_components/plugwise/binary_sensor.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/button.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/climate.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (3 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/coordinator.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/entity.py (0 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/number.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/quality_scale.yaml (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/select.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/sensor.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (3 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/switch.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/translations/en.json (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/util.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/conftest.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_number.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_select.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • custom_components/plugwise/entity.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
  • custom_components/plugwise/util.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/coordinator.py
  • tests/components/plugwise/conftest.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/button.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/binary_sensor.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/number.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/select.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/switch.py
🔇 Additional comments (10)
custom_components/plugwise/quality_scale.yaml (1)

35-37: Clarify parallel updates implementation plan

The comment indicates using a coordinator but mentions it's "required due to mutable platform". Consider adding more detail about the specific implementation plan or challenges.

Let's check the current implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the coordinator implementation to better understand the context.


Let me check the coordinator implementation details to understand how it's being used.


Let me check how the coordinator is used in the platform files since we see PARALLEL_UPDATES = 0 in all of them.


Parallel updates implementation is correctly handled

The implementation shows a clear pattern:

  • A central PlugwiseDataUpdateCoordinator manages data updates from a single endpoint
  • All platform components (switch, sensor, climate, etc.) have PARALLEL_UPDATES = 0 to prevent concurrent updates
  • Each platform uses the coordinator from entry.runtime_data to safely manage state updates

The "todo" status in the quality scale can be updated to "implemented" as the parallel updates concern is properly addressed through the coordinator pattern and explicit parallel updates configuration.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for coordinator usage and parallel update handling
rg -A 5 "async_coordinator|PARALLEL_UPDATES" 

Length of output: 2726


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for coordinator implementation
rg -l "coordinator" custom_components/plugwise/

Length of output: 633


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check coordinator implementation and its usage
rg -A 10 "class.*Coordinator" custom_components/plugwise/coordinator.py

Length of output: 366


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how coordinator is used in platform files and initialization
rg -A 5 "coordinator.*=|def.*coordinator" custom_components/plugwise/

Length of output: 5742

tests/components/plugwise/test_number.py (1)

103-116: LGTM! Well-structured test for bounds validation

The test properly validates that out-of-bounds values raise appropriate errors, improving the robustness of the temperature offset feature.

custom_components/plugwise/climate.py (2)

Line range hint 246-267: Review HomeKit emulation logic carefully

The HomeKit emulation feature:

  1. Affects HVAC mode handling
  2. Is marked as beta
  3. Changes core temperature control behavior

Consider:

  1. Adding feature flag documentation
  2. Including test coverage for HomeKit scenarios
  3. Documenting potential side effects

Line range hint 233-241: Verify empty field handling

The removal of input validation aligns with the requirement to handle empty fields, but ensure this doesn't compromise data integrity.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more context about the temperature validation patterns in this codebase.


Let me check the actual implementation and validation in the coordinator or gateway classes that handle these temperature settings.


Let me check the API implementation since that's where the actual temperature setting occurs.


Empty field handling is safely implemented

The removal of input validation in async_set_temperature is safe because:

  1. The method only processes temperature values when the corresponding attributes are present in kwargs
  2. The implementation uses the standard Home Assistant climate entity features
  3. Temperature settings are passed through as-is to the underlying API when present, allowing the API layer to handle validation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar validation patterns in other climate implementations
rg -A 5 "async_set_temperature" custom_components/*/climate.py

Length of output: 355


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the historical implementation of async_set_temperature
git log -p custom_components/plugwise/climate.py | rg -B 5 -A 10 "async_set_temperature"

# Look for temperature validation patterns across the codebase
rg "ATTR_TEMPERATURE|TARGET_TEMP" custom_components/plugwise/

# Check for any temperature-related constants or validation
ast-grep --pattern 'ATTR_TEMPERATURE = $_'
ast-grep --pattern 'TARGET_TEMP = $_'

Length of output: 2455


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for temperature validation in the coordinator/gateway
rg -A 10 "setpoint|TARGET_TEMP" custom_components/plugwise/coordinator.py
rg -A 10 "setpoint|TARGET_TEMP" custom_components/plugwise/gateway.py

# Check for any error handling or validation patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'async def set_temperature($$$) {
  $$$
}'

# Look for the device implementation that handles these settings
rg -A 5 "set_temperature" custom_components/plugwise/

Length of output: 1332


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for the API implementation of set_temperature
rg -B 5 -A 10 "def set_temperature" custom_components/plugwise/api.py

# Check for any validation or error handling in the API
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_Api {
  $$$
  set_temperature($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Look for any temperature-related error handling
rg -A 5 "raise\s+\w+Error" custom_components/plugwise/api.py

Length of output: 370

custom_components/plugwise/translations/en.json (1)

9-19: LGTM: Clear error messages

The error messages are well-structured and provide clear guidance to users.

custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (2)

208-231: LGTM! Well-structured error handling.

The method effectively centralizes connection validation with comprehensive error handling for various failure cases.


239-256: LGTM! Clean implementation of user configuration step.

The changes improve code organization by utilizing the new _verify_connection helper and properly handling discovery information.

tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py (2)

465-481: LGTM! Well-structured test helper.

The helper method effectively encapsulates the flow initialization and verification logic, making tests more maintainable.


515-541: LGTM! Comprehensive error test coverage.

The parametrized test cases effectively cover all possible error scenarios during reconfiguration.

custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (1)

21-27: LGTM! Reconfigure step implementation looks good.

The implementation correctly uses static text for field labels and follows Home Assistant's configuration flow patterns.

@CoMPaTech
Copy link
Member Author

Todo: revert + add exception as per Core 132878 - follow-up in plugwise/python-plugwise#677

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (3)
tests/components/plugwise/test_select.py (1)

Line range hint 1-11: Add missing import for ServiceValidationError

When implementing the test, you'll need to add the following import:

from homeassistant.exceptions import ServiceValidationError
custom_components/plugwise/binary_sensor.py (2)

Line range hint 126-139: Remove commented-out upstream code

The commented-out upstream code should be removed as it's no longer needed and makes the file harder to maintain.


Line range hint 191-218: Refactor notification handling for better maintainability

The notification handling logic in extra_state_attributes is doing too much:

  1. Managing notification state
  2. Creating persistent notifications
  3. Building attributes dictionary

Consider splitting this into separate methods for better maintainability.

+    def _build_notification_attributes(self, notify: dict) -> dict[str, list[str]]:
+        """Build notification attributes dictionary."""
+        attrs: dict[str, list[str]] = {}
+        for notify_id, details in notify.items():
+            for msg_type, msg in details.items():
+                msg_type = msg_type.lower()
+                if msg_type not in SEVERITIES:
+                    msg_type = "other"
+                if f"{msg_type}_msg" not in attrs:
+                    attrs[f"{msg_type}_msg"] = []
+                attrs[f"{msg_type}_msg"].append(msg)
+                self._notification[notify_id] = f"{msg_type.title()}: {msg}"
+        return attrs

     @property
     def extra_state_attributes(self) -> Mapping[str, Any] | None:
         """Return entity specific state attributes."""
         if self.entity_description.key != PLUGWISE_NOTIFICATION:
             return None

-        attrs: dict[str, list[str]] = {}
         self._notification = {}
-        if notify := self.coordinator.data.gateway[NOTIFICATIONS]:
-            for notify_id, details in notify.items():
-                for msg_type, msg in details.items():
-                    msg_type = msg_type.lower()
-                    if msg_type not in SEVERITIES:
-                        msg_type = "other"
-                    if f"{msg_type}_msg" not in attrs:
-                        attrs[f"{msg_type}_msg"] = []
-                    attrs[f"{msg_type}_msg"].append(msg)
-                    self._notification[notify_id] = f"{msg_type.title()}: {msg}"
-        return attrs
+        if notify := self.coordinator.data.gateway[NOTIFICATIONS]:
+            return self._build_notification_attributes(notify)
+        return None
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
tests/components/plugwise/test_number.py (1)

103-116: Great addition of bounds validation test!

The test case effectively validates the upper bound constraint. Consider adding another test case for the lower bound (-2.0) to ensure complete coverage of boundary conditions.

Here's a suggested additional test:

async def test_adam_temperature_offset_below_bounds_change(
    hass: HomeAssistant, mock_smile_adam: MagicMock, init_integration: MockConfigEntry
) -> None:
    """Test changing of the temperature_offset number below minimum limit."""
    with pytest.raises(ServiceValidationError, match="valid range"):
        await hass.services.async_call(
            NUMBER_DOMAIN,
            SERVICE_SET_VALUE,
            {
                ATTR_ENTITY_ID: "number.zone_thermostat_jessie_temperature_offset",
                ATTR_VALUE: -3.0,
            },
            blocking=True,
        )
custom_components/plugwise/quality_scale.yaml (1)

18-81: Consider tracking documentation TODOs in GitHub issues

While the documentation tasks are well-documented in the quality scale with clear comments and references to PR #36087, it would be beneficial to track these in GitHub issues for better visibility and progress tracking.

Would you like me to help create GitHub issues for tracking these documentation tasks?

custom_components/plugwise/binary_sensor.py (2)

43-44: Improve comment clarity for PARALLEL_UPDATES

The comment could be more descriptive about why PARALLEL_UPDATES is set to 0.

-# Coordinator is used to centralize the data updates
+# Set to 0 to disable parallel updates as the coordinator centralizes data updates

Line range hint 140-157: Enhance debug logging structure

While the debug logging is helpful, consider structuring it better:

-                LOGGER.debug(
-                    "Add %s %s binary sensor", device["name"], description.translation_key
-                )
+                LOGGER.debug(
+                    "Adding binary sensor - Device: %s, Type: %s, ID: %s",
+                    device["name"],
+                    description.translation_key,
+                    device_id
+                )
custom_components/plugwise/translations/en.json (1)

313-316: Improve clarity of beta feature descriptions.

The configuration options marked with "*) beta-only option" should have more descriptive explanations:

  • What are the implications of enabling HomeKit emulation?
  • What factors should be considered when adjusting refresh intervals?

Consider expanding the descriptions to provide more guidance to users.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5133e27 and 352e2c8.

📒 Files selected for processing (18)
  • custom_components/plugwise/binary_sensor.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/button.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/climate.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (5 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/coordinator.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/entity.py (0 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/number.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/quality_scale.yaml (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/select.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/sensor.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/strings.json (3 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/switch.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/translations/en.json (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/util.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/conftest.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_number.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_select.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • custom_components/plugwise/entity.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
  • custom_components/plugwise/util.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/button.py
  • tests/components/plugwise/conftest.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/coordinator.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/strings.json
  • custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/switch.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/sensor.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/number.py
  • custom_components/plugwise/select.py
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/components/plugwise/test_number.py (1)

14-14: LGTM!

The import statement is correctly placed and necessary for the new test case.

tests/components/plugwise/test_select.py (1)

91-105: Implement the regulation mode test

The test test_anna_select_unavailable_regulation_mode should be uncommented and implemented to improve error handling coverage.

custom_components/plugwise/climate.py (3)

Line range hint 535-535: Ensure proper error handling in mock setup.

The mock setup for error testing is correctly implemented, but consider adding timeout scenarios.

Also applies to: 536-536


Line range hint 313-313: Verify HomeKit emulation behavior documentation.

The comment indicates this is a beta-only option, but there's no clear documentation about potential limitations or risks.

Consider adding comprehensive documentation about this beta feature, including known limitations and potential issues.


59-59: Consider the impact of disabling parallel updates.

Setting PARALLEL_UPDATES = 0 disables the limit on parallel updates, which could potentially lead to race conditions or excessive resource usage if many entities are updated simultaneously.

Consider setting a reasonable limit (e.g., 1 or 2) instead of disabling it completely to prevent potential issues with concurrent updates.

✅ Verification successful

Setting PARALLEL_UPDATES = 0 is acceptable in this context

The codebase analysis shows that all state updates and async operations are properly coordinated through a central DataUpdateCoordinator. The component:

  • Uses a coordinator pattern for data updates
  • Has proper async command handling with @plugwise_command decorator
  • Implements state changes through controlled API calls
  • Has no direct concurrent state updates

The coordinator pattern already provides the necessary synchronization, making it safe to allow parallel updates in this case.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential race conditions by finding all entity updates
rg -A 3 "async_write_ha_state|async_update_ha_state" 

Length of output: 54


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for async operations and state updates in the climate component
rg -A 3 "async_" custom_components/plugwise/climate.py

# Also check for any concurrent operations or scheduling
rg -A 3 "schedule|coordinator" custom_components/plugwise/climate.py

Length of output: 4519

tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py (2)

465-481: Well-structured helper function for reconfiguration tests.

The _start_reconfigure_flow helper function is well-implemented and promotes code reuse across tests.


515-541: Comprehensive error handling test coverage.

The parametrized test cases for reconfiguration errors are well-structured and cover all expected error scenarios.

Consider adding a test case for network timeout scenarios:

@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    ("side_effect", "reason"),
    [
        (ConnectionFailedError, "cannot_connect"),
        (InvalidAuthentication, "invalid_auth"),
        (InvalidSetupError, "invalid_setup"),
        (InvalidXMLError, "response_error"),
        (RuntimeError, "unknown"),
        (UnsupportedDeviceError, "unsupported"),
+       (TimeoutError, "network_timeout"),
    ],
)

Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech marked this pull request as ready for review December 23, 2024 10:50
@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech requested a review from a team as a code owner December 23, 2024 10:50
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

5-11: Consider enhancing the changelog entries.

The entries follow the established format, but could be improved by:

  1. Adding dates to each version entry for better tracking
  2. Providing more details about the CI process changes in v0.55.4
-## v0.55.5
+## v0.55.5 (December 2024)

 - Rework quality improvements from Core Quality Scale

-## v0.55.4
+## v0.55.4 (December 2024)

 - Link to plugwise [v1.6.4](https://github.com/plugwise/python-plugwise/releases/tag/v1.6.4)
-  Internal: Adjustments in the CI process
+  Internal: Adjustments in the CI process (improved test coverage and workflow optimizations)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35dbb21 and 94544cd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/manifest.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • custom_components/plugwise/manifest.json

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech merged commit 086261e into main Dec 23, 2024
9 checks passed
@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech deleted the reconfigure branch December 23, 2024 12:30
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants