Skip to content

Conversation

@CoMPaTech
Copy link
Member

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech commented Aug 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved CI workflow for coverage artifacts: constrained downloads to coverage-only, unified storage directory, and enabled merging when multiple artifacts exist.
  • Tests
    • Updated coverage aggregation to read from the new artifact location, improving reliability of combined coverage results.

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech requested a review from a team as a code owner August 13, 2025 17:13
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 13, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated the CI verify workflow to use actions/download-artifact@v5 with filtering and merged downloads into a dedicated artifacts directory, and adjusted the coverage combination step to read from the new location. No other logic changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
CI workflow adjustments
.github/workflows/verify.yml
Bumped actions/download-artifact to v5; added with: pattern=coverage-, merge-multiple=true, path=${{ github.workspace }}/artifacts; updated coverage combination to read artifacts/.coverage instead of coverage*/.coverage*.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Poem

I hop through logs with ears held high,
New artifacts in a tidy sty.
Coverage crumbs in one neat heap,
v5 tools help metrics keep.
Thump-thump—CI’s clean and spry!

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch artifactv5fix

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 13, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.70%. Comparing base (d3a7331) to head (4ac15f5).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #315   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.70%   80.70%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        7536     7536           
=======================================
  Hits         6082     6082           
  Misses       1454     1454           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3a7331 and 4ac15f5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/verify.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Run pytest using Python 3.13
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/verify.yml (1)

256-260: No collision risk with single Python version — consider future-proofing

The actions/download-artifact step still uses merge-multiple: true, but since the matrix only contains one entry (python-version: ["3.13"]), there’s no risk of .coverage filename collisions today. To guard against future matrix expansions, you can:

  • Remove merge-multiple to keep each artifact in its own subdirectory and then run coverage combine artifacts/**/.coverage.
  • Or rename .coverage before uploading (e.g. mv .coverage .coverage.${{ matrix.python-version }}), keep merge-multiple: true, and combine with coverage combine artifacts/.coverage*.

This ensures safe aggregation of coverage data whether you have one or many Python versions.

Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice fix, thanks @CoMPaTech

@bouwew bouwew merged commit 745784d into main Aug 13, 2025
17 checks passed
@bouwew bouwew deleted the artifactv5fix branch August 13, 2025 18:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants