Follow beta/core with uv #595
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes introduce the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- requirements_test.txt (1 hunks)
- scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh (1 hunks)
- tests/INIT.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- requirements_test.txt
Additional comments not posted (3)
scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh (2)
27-27: LGTM!The addition of the
pip install uvcommand ensures that theuvpackage is installed before other dependencies.
28-28: LGTM! But verify the usage ofuv.The change to use
uvfor installing dependencies looks good.However, ensure that the usage of
uvis correctly integrated and documented.Verification successful
Verified: The usage of
uvis correctly integrated.The
uvpackage is installed usingpipand then used to install dependencies fromrequirements_test.txtandrequirements_commit.txt.
pip install uvuv pip install -r requirements_test.txt -r requirements_commit.txtScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `uv` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `uv`. Expect: Correct integration and documentation. rg --type shell -A 5 $'uv'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `uv` in the codebase. # Find all shell script files and search for the usage of `uv`. fd -e sh -x rg 'uv' {}Length of output: 106
tests/INIT.md (1)
30-30: LGTM! But verify the usage ofuv.The change to use
uvfor installing dependencies looks good.However, ensure that the usage of
uvis correctly integrated and documented.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- requirements_test.txt (1 hunks)
- scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh (1 hunks)
- tests/INIT.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- requirements_test.txt
- scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh
- tests/INIT.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/verify.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/verify.yml (1)
100-100: Approved: Changeruffcommand to explicit check mode.The change from
ruff plugwise/*py tests/*pytoruff check plugwise/*py tests/*pyensures that the command only analyzes the specified Python files without making any changes. This adjustment helps maintain code integrity by preventing unintended modifications during code quality checks.
|
Quickly mocked our 404-path handling in https://gist.github.com/CoMPaTech/541eb68906431933d2b3ea48e886b92b failing on aiohttp 3.10.0 and working on 3.9.5 and lower. |
|
Set to draft pending outcome |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
tests/INIT.md (1)
30-30: Undefineduvprefix in setup commandsThe
uvprefix used in the setup commands withintests/INIT.mdandscripts/tests_and_coverage.shis not defined or documented in the repository. This could lead to confusion or errors during the setup process. Please ensure that theuvprefix is either defined within the repository or properly documented.
tests/INIT.mdscripts/tests_and_coverage.shAnalysis chain
LGTM! Ensure the
uvprefix is documented and functional.The changes introduce the
uvprefix before thepip installcommands, likely for enhancing asynchronous task support. Ensure that this change is documented and does not introduce any issues.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the `uv` prefix in the setup command. # Test: Search for the `uv` prefix usage. Expect: No functionality issues due to the prefix. rg --type markdown -A 5 $'uv pip install'Length of output: 488
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for definitions or explanations of the `uv` prefix within the repository. # Search for the `uv` prefix in shell scripts and markdown files. rg --type sh --type markdown 'uv ' -A 5 # Search for alias or function definitions for `uv` in shell scripts. rg --type sh 'alias uv=' rg --type sh 'function uv'Length of output: 1583
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- patch/aiohttp310.patch (1 hunks)
- requirements_test.txt (1 hunks)
- scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh (1 hunks)
- tests/INIT.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- requirements_test.txt
- scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh
Additional comments not posted (1)
patch/aiohttp310.patch (1)
1-16: LGTM! Simplified logic improves readability.The changes simplify the
_get_resource_index_keymethod by removing the nested if-else logic. Ensure that the removed logic does not affect the functionality.
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #595 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 3318 3318
=========================================
Hits 3318 3318 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/verify.yml (3 hunks)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- CHANGELOG.md
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/verify.yml
|
@bouwew apparently ruff was also mixed in somewhere (+additional |
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
rufftool.Documentation