Fix coverage from recent v3/v4 changes

[CoMPaTech]

Fixes aligning from actions/upload-artifact#602

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Improvements
  • Streamlined the GitHub Actions workflow by removing outdated patching logic for the aiohttp library.
  • Enhanced cache management with new parameters for error handling and inclusion of hidden files.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file verify.yml by removing outdated patching logic for the aiohttp library and enhancing the caching step. Specifically, it eliminates code related to patching aiohttp version 3.10.0, indicating that this process is no longer required. Additionally, it introduces two new parameters to improve cache management, streamlining the workflow overall.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
.github/workflows/verify.yml	Removed patching logic for aiohttp; added if-no-files-found: error and include-hidden-files: true to caching step.

Possibly related PRs

• Remove workarounds (HA-core updated to aiohttp 3.10.1 #600: This PR removes outdated patching logic for the aiohttp library, which aligns with the main PR's removal of similar patching code in the verify.yml workflow file.

Suggested labels

enhancement

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, changes bloom bright,
Patching no longer needed, everything feels right.
Caches now handle files, both hidden and seen,
A workflow streamlined, like a hop through the green.
Let's celebrate progress, with a joyful cheer,
For every small change brings us all near! 🌼

Tip

New features

Walkthrough comment now includes:

• Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context.
• Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.

Notes:

• Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
• Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (871a763) to head (6683e03).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #615   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           20        20           
  Lines         3345      3345           
=========================================
  Hits          3345      3345           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 871a763 and 6683e03.

Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/verify.yml (3 hunks)

Additional context used

actionlint

.github/workflows/verify.yml

245-245: input "include-hidden-files" is not defined in action "actions/upload-artifact@v4". available inputs are "compression-level", "if-no-files-found", "name", "overwrite", "path", "retention-days"

(action)

[coderabbitai]

Remove the invalid include-hidden-files parameter.

The addition of the if-no-files-found: error parameter looks good as it specifies error handling when no files are found.

However, the include-hidden-files: true parameter is not a valid input for the actions/upload-artifact@v4 action. Please remove it.

Apply this diff to remove the invalid parameter:

-          include-hidden-files: true

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	if-no-files-found: error
	include-hidden-files: true
	if-no-files-found: error

Tools

actionlint

245-245: input "include-hidden-files" is not defined in action "actions/upload-artifact@v4". available inputs are "compression-level", "if-no-files-found", "name", "overwrite", "path", "retention-days"

(action)

[bouwew]

LGTM!

Apart dat Coderabbitai achterloopt...