Skip to content

Conversation

@bouwew
Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew commented Sep 25, 2024

While adding the config_flow updates in Core Plugwise, I realized we always start with a timeout of 30 secs, so testing a fail takes a long time. Then I thought, we know the password, only if equal to stretch set the timeout to 30 :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced improved timeout settings: 30 seconds for the Stretch device and 10 seconds for all other devices.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted timeout assertions in tests to reflect new logic based on username conditions.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified constructors by removing the timeout parameter across multiple classes.
    • Updated connection logic to eliminate timeout-related functionality.
  • Chores

    • Updated project version to 1.4.2a0 in the configuration files.
    • Revised changelog to reflect the new version and improvements.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve the removal of the DEFAULT_LEGACY_TIMEOUT and DEFAULT_TIMEOUT constants from the plugwise/__init__.py file, along with the elimination of the timeout parameter from the constructors of several classes. The connect method has been updated to reflect these changes, simplifying the timeout handling. Corresponding updates in the tests/test_init.py file adjust timeout assertions and username handling, ensuring consistency with the new structure.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
plugwise/__init__.py Removed DEFAULT_LEGACY_TIMEOUT and DEFAULT_TIMEOUT constants; updated constructor to eliminate timeout parameter; modified connect method to remove timeout parameter.
tests/test_init.py Updated timeout assertions from 30 to 10; made username in connect_legacy conditional based on stretch parameter; adjusted timeout assertions based on username; modified method signatures for connect_legacy and connect_legacy_wrapper to include stretch parameter.
CHANGELOG.md, pyproject.toml Updated version to v1.4.2, reflecting changes in timeout settings for devices; added changelog entry for new version.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • CoMPaTech

🐰 In the code, we hop and play,
Removing timeouts, hooray!
Constants new, and tests refined,
A cleaner path for us to find.
With each change, we leap so high,
In the world of code, we’ll fly! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (2fd4f1c) to head (ce6de3d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #627   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           20        20           
  Lines         3360      3365    +5     
=========================================
+ Hits          3360      3365    +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
plugwise/helper.py (1)

Line range hint 1-1000: Overall, the changes improve timeout handling but may require additional testing.

The modifications to the constants and the SmileComm class init method improve the timeout handling as per the PR objectives. However, these changes may have implications for the overall system behavior, especially for users with legacy setups. Consider the following:

  1. Ensure comprehensive testing is done for both default and legacy timeout scenarios.
  2. Update the documentation to reflect these changes, especially regarding the new timeout behavior.
  3. Consider adding unit tests specifically for the new timeout logic.

To further improve the robustness of the system, consider implementing a configuration system that allows users to override these timeout values if needed, perhaps through environment variables or a configuration file.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2fd4f1c and 5db0b09.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • plugwise/init.py (0 hunks)
  • plugwise/helper.py (2 hunks)
  • plugwise/legacy/helper.py (0 hunks)
  • plugwise/legacy/smile.py (0 hunks)
  • plugwise/smile.py (0 hunks)
  • tests/test_init.py (6 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (4)
  • plugwise/init.py
  • plugwise/legacy/helper.py
  • plugwise/legacy/smile.py
  • plugwise/smile.py
🔇 Additional comments not posted (5)
plugwise/helper.py (1)

19-21: LGTM. Please clarify the usage of these new constants.

The addition of DEFAULT_LEGACY_TIMEOUT, DEFAULT_TIMEOUT, and DEFAULT_USERNAME constants is good for maintaining consistency and ease of configuration. However, it would be helpful to have a brief comment explaining their purpose and how they relate to the improved timeout setting mentioned in the PR description.

✅ Verification successful

Verification Successful. The new constants DEFAULT_LEGACY_TIMEOUT, DEFAULT_TIMEOUT, and DEFAULT_USERNAME are appropriately used across the codebase without any issues.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the usage of the new constants in the codebase
rg "DEFAULT_LEGACY_TIMEOUT|DEFAULT_TIMEOUT|DEFAULT_USERNAME" --type python

Length of output: 107


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the usage of the new constants in the codebase with corrected file type
rg "DEFAULT_LEGACY_TIMEOUT|DEFAULT_TIMEOUT|DEFAULT_USERNAME" --type py

Length of output: 1075

tests/test_init.py (4)

370-372: Username Assignment Based on 'stretch' Parameter Looks Good

The logic for assigning user_name based on the stretch parameter is clear and correct.


406-406: Passing user_name to Smile Object

Passing username=user_name to the Smile object ensures the correct username is used based on the stretch parameter. This change is appropriate.

Also applies to: 419-419


426-429: Correct Timeout Assertion Based on Username

The assertions correctly verify that when user_name is pw_constants.STRETCH, the timeout is 30 seconds; otherwise, it's 10 seconds. This ensures that the timeout setting is validated according to the username.


488-500: Proper Propagation of stretch Parameter

Passing the stretch parameter in connect_legacy_wrapper ensures that the stretch logic is consistently applied throughout the connection methods. This change maintains the integrity of the test flow.

@bouwew bouwew marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2024 09:25
@bouwew bouwew requested a review from a team as a code owner September 25, 2024 09:25
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43c9dde and ce6de3d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (5)
CHANGELOG.md (5)

3-6: LGTM: New version entry is clear and concise.

The new version entry for v1.4.2 is well-formatted and provides a clear description of the improvement made to the timeout settings.


Line range hint 8-1080: No changes to existing entries.

The entries from v1.4.1 to v1.0.0 remain unchanged. These provide a valuable history of previous changes and improvements to the project.


Line range hint 1082-1109: Historical context preserved.

The "Old change log python-plugwise" section maintains important historical information about the former USB-only fork. This is valuable for users transitioning from older versions and for understanding the project's evolution.


Line range hint 1111-1334: Valuable project history maintained.

The "Change log former Smile" section preserves the history of the former Plugwise_Smile Network-only module. This information is crucial for understanding the project's evolution, especially the merging of different modules into the current unified project.


Line range hint 1-1334: Excellent changelog structure and completeness.

The overall structure and formatting of the changelog are exemplary. It provides a comprehensive history of the project, including recent changes and the evolution from separate modules to a unified project. The consistent formatting and clear version headings make it easy to navigate and understand the project's development over time.

@bouwew
Copy link
Contributor Author

bouwew commented Sep 28, 2024

Closed, not implemented. A better solution has been implemented in the frontend Integration.

@bouwew bouwew closed this Sep 28, 2024
@bouwew bouwew deleted the better_timeout branch October 6, 2024 10:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants