Skip to content

Conversation

CoMPaTech
Copy link
Member

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech commented Jul 16, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved efficiency of version existence checks during package publishing workflows, resulting in a more streamlined process for verifying package versions on PyPI and TestPyPI. No changes to user-facing functionality.

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech requested a review from a team as a code owner July 16, 2025 14:39
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the version existence check in two GitHub Actions workflow files. Instead of storing all existing package versions in a variable before checking for a match, the new approach directly streams the version list and checks for the target version in a single command pipeline. No changes were made to the workflows' overall logic or outputs.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/merge.yml,
.github/workflows/verify.yml
Simplified the version existence check by removing the intermediate variable and using a direct command pipeline with jq and grep to check if the target version exists on PyPI/TestPyPI.

Poem

A hop, a skip, a streamlined check,
No more storing versions on the techy deck.
Directly we seek, with jq and grep,
For the version we want, in just one step!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 71df2e3 and 6c7dab9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/merge.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/verify.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Check commit
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch pypifix

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this fixes the issue, fine for me :)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (71df2e3) to head (45f1a31).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #772   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines         3388      3388           
=========================================
  Hits          3388      3388           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@CoMPaTech
Copy link
Member Author

Lets run it again

Copy link

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech merged commit 8a9adc0 into main Jul 16, 2025
17 checks passed
@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech deleted the pypifix branch July 16, 2025 14:49
@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants