Skip to content

Conversation

@lionel-
Copy link
Contributor

@lionel- lionel- commented Oct 28, 2025

Closes #953

@lionel- lionel- requested a review from DavisVaughan October 28, 2025 16:24
@DavisVaughan
Copy link
Contributor

I guess it was mildly useful to be able to detect the stack overflow here #562

@lionel- lionel- force-pushed the bugfix/top-level-exec-peek branch from a95c19a to bad5e9a Compare October 29, 2025 09:28
@lionel- lionel- force-pushed the bugfix/top-level-exec-peek branch from bad5e9a to f4d3e3f Compare October 29, 2025 09:30
@lionel- lionel- merged commit 92b03c4 into main Oct 29, 2025
8 checks passed
@lionel- lionel- deleted the bugfix/top-level-exec-peek branch October 29, 2025 09:39
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 29, 2025
@lionel-
Copy link
Contributor Author

lionel- commented Oct 29, 2025

We now still show the stack overflow message in the message if we detect one. It may still be wrong, which is documented.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Misleading error report in case of longjump

3 participants