Skip to content

Conversation

@jonrohan
Copy link
Member

@jonrohan jonrohan commented Oct 6, 2025

I noticed with the last unlock it skipped running because the event name wasn't 'released'

@jonrohan jonrohan requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2025 17:38
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 6, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: add61d8

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@jonrohan jonrohan added the skip changeset This change does not need a changelog label Oct 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes the unlock step in the toggle release lock workflow by adding support for prerelease events. The change ensures that the unlock step runs for both regular releases and prereleases, addressing an issue where the workflow was skipping execution for prerelease events.

  • Added 'prereleased' condition to the unlock step trigger logic

@jonrohan jonrohan added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 6, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 985ba9a Oct 6, 2025
46 of 48 checks passed
@jonrohan jonrohan deleted the jonrohan-patch-3 branch October 6, 2025 18:06
pksjce pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip changeset This change does not need a changelog staff Author is a staff member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants