Optimize Claude Code Review workflow for efficiency and reliability #16312
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This change addresses two issues with the Claude Code Review workflow: 1. Reviews were not appearing on PRs (only in logs) 2. Excessive token usage from failed commands (~40-50% waste) Changes: - Instruct Claude to post its own review using gh pr comment - Add GITHUB_TOKEN env var to enable gh CLI authentication - Remove separate PR comment posting step (Claude does it directly) - Embed review criteria directly in prompt instead of failed /docs-review - Add CI efficiency guidelines to minimize token usage - Streamline allowed tools to essentials (Read, Glob, Grep, gh commands) - Reference .claude/commands/docs-review.md as source of truth Token savings: - Eliminates ~15K tokens from failed /docs-review slash command - Prevents wasted attempts at make serve, make lint, make build - Guides Claude to work from diffs before reading full files - Estimated 40-50% reduction in tokens per review (33K → 16-20K) 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Collaborator
|
Your site preview for commit 35da6fe is ready! 🎉 http://www-testing-pulumi-docs-origin-pr-16312-35da6fec.s3-website.us-west-2.amazonaws.com. |
…e Analysis" to "Analysis"
…utcome based on issue description
Collaborator
|
Your site preview for commit 479dc0c is ready! 🎉 http://www-testing-pulumi-docs-origin-pr-16312-479dc0cc.s3-website.us-west-2.amazonaws.com. |
Collaborator
|
Your site preview for commit c7106f2 is ready! 🎉 http://www-testing-pulumi-docs-origin-pr-16312-c7106f29.s3-website.us-west-2.amazonaws.com. |
Collaborator
|
Your site preview for commit f4a9a86 is ready! 🎉 http://www-testing-pulumi-docs-origin-pr-16312-f4a9a860.s3-website.us-west-2.amazonaws.com. |
fallimic
approved these changes
Oct 17, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes two critical issues with the Claude Code Review workflow:
Changes
1. Reviews now appear on PRs
gh pr commentGITHUB_TOKENenvironment variable to the claude-review step2. Token usage optimization
Eliminated failed slash command:
/docs-reviewinvocation that was failing (~15K tokens saved).claude/commands/docs-review.mdas source of truth (no duplication)Added CI efficiency guidelines:
gh pr diffoutput first (most efficient)make serve,make lint,make buildattemptsStreamlined allowed tools:
Read,Glob,Grep,ghcommandsImpact
Token savings: 40-50% reduction per review
Reliability: Reviews now consistently appear on PRs instead of only in logs
Testing
The workflow will be tested on the next PR that triggers it. The optimizations ensure:
🤖 Generated with Claude Code