Skip to content

Conversation

jamesdbrock
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@thomashoneyman thomashoneyman merged commit 878390c into purescript:master Jun 22, 2021
@thomashoneyman
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@hdgarrood
Copy link
Collaborator

I don’t think this was a typo, actually. I think “a type Frob at kind Type” makes more sense than “a type Frob as kind Type”. If “at” sounds weird, then I think we could rewrite to “a type Frob whose kind is Type” or something.

@jamesdbrock
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don’t think this was a typo, actually. I think “a type Frob at kind Type” makes more sense than “a type Frob as kind Type”. If “at” sounds weird, then I think we could rewrite to “a type Frob whose kind is Type” or something.

Well then oops. I believe you, but this surprises me. I would say “a value Frob as type Type” and I would say “a type Frob as kind Type.”

I will open a reversion PR, then we can decide whether to merge that.

jamesdbrock added a commit to jamesdbrock/documentation that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2021
JordanMartinez added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2022
* Revert "FFI.md typo (#388)"

This reverts commit 878390c.

* Use 'has kind' phrasing

Co-authored-by: JordanMartinez <jordanalex.martinez@protonmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants