Skip to content

Conversation

lvh
Copy link
Member

@lvh lvh commented Jun 17, 2014

This document is horribly outdated and did more bad than good. It
contained about half of something that vaguely resembled an issue
tracker, and has otherwise hasn't been touched since the project's
inception.

This document is horribly outdated and did more bad than good. It
contained about half of something that vaguely resembled an issue
tracker, and has otherwise hasn't been touched since the project's
inception.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling 85ce662 on lvh:remove-rationale into 1110bc9 on pyca:master.

@lvh
Copy link
Member Author

lvh commented Jun 18, 2014

This also needs to be removed from MANIFEST.in, which reminds me that checking MANIFEST.in isn't part of PyOpenSSL's automated test suite yet.

@lvh
Copy link
Member Author

lvh commented Jun 19, 2014

I submitted PR #127 which addresses the "we're not really checking manifests" problem.

@alex
Copy link
Member

alex commented Aug 15, 2014

+1 on removing this.

@exarkun exarkun merged commit 85ce662 into pyca:master Mar 15, 2015
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants