- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 312
          feat: add join method to Url class
          #1378
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Open
      
      
            Meetesh-Saini
  wants to merge
  5
  commits into
  pydantic:main
  
    
      
        
          
  
    
      Choose a base branch
      
     
    
      
        
      
      
        
          
          
        
        
          
            
              
              
              
  
           
        
        
          
            
              
              
           
        
       
     
  
        
          
            
          
            
          
        
       
    
      
from
Meetesh-Saini:dev-url-join
  
      
      
   
  
    
  
  
  
 
  
      
    base: main
Could not load branches
            
              
  
    Branch not found: {{ refName }}
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Could not load tags
            
            
              Nothing to show
            
              
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Are you sure you want to change the base?
            Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
            and old review comments may become outdated.
          
          
  
     Open
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            5 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      a7d9351
              
                feat: add `join` method to `Url` class
              
              
                Meetesh-Saini 7ef57ba
              
                Merge branch 'pydantic:main' into dev-url-join
              
              
                Meetesh-Saini e8bd322
              
                refactor(url): Update URL join function and add corresponding tests
              
              
                Meetesh-Saini 8b70975
              
                refactor: update url `join` method implementation and function signature
              
              
                Meetesh-Saini 6a4fa06
              
                Merge branch 'pydantic:main' into dev-url-join
              
              
                Meetesh-Saini File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, sorry I missed these in the last round of review. I think the difference between the
/and//operators here is subtle and hard to document.I think better we just have
/, and make it so that it matches the default ofappend_trailing_slash=False. This will also simplify testing, I think.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay
__floordiv__can be removed but I feel the__truediv__should haveappend_trailing_slash=Truebecause this overloaded operator would likely be used to join multiple paths in shorter code. This behaviour would feel familiar to Python users, as it resemblespathlib's path joining.For example,
With
append_trailing_slash=Falseit would instead result inhttp://a/dandfile:///home/user/popwhich I think is not what the user would expect.I chose to add
__floordiv__too because it would simplify adding files at the end.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I see. Yikes, there are so many subleties here!
It seems to me that our
.join()method really works likeurllib.parse.urljoinwhen it comes to semantics, e.g.versus pathlib's
Given these are inconsistent, I think we should perhaps back away from trying to have pathlib-like semantics at all.
Would you be open to the idea of dropping the operators from the PR completely, so we can get
.join()merged? We could then open apydanticissue to discuss the design of the operators and move forward with an implementation when there's consensus?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively we could also have
joinpath()which works likePathliband doesn't accept query string or fragments as the whole input?And then could have
/operator work likejoinpath? 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
joinpath()would certainly make things cleaner. Should I implementjoinpath()in this PR, or should we drop the operators for now and discuss it in the issues instead?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great question. I think I'd prefer we just had
.join()here and worried about.joinpath()and the operators later. That said, there's potentially a desire to agree a sketch of the follow ups here. @pydantic/oss - any ideas?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think without comment from anyone else, let's just do
.join()here and then follow-up with an issue in the mainpydanticrepo where we can discuss.joinpath()and operators.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be great to have more time to discuss the semantics (does it need to match
urllib? What about other libraries likefurl? Should be double check with the current RFCs? We should also check what was said in this discussion).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really sorry for the late response. The main URL joining part is handled by rust-url's join method which implements the WHATWG URL spec. So, the
/operator semantics are handled by the libraries in our case, python libraries likeurllibandfurl. Whilefurlprovides/operator,urllibdoes not.urllib.parse.urljoinandfurl.furl.joinfollows the RFC 3986 to resolve the new URL.furlis using/operator for only adding path to URL like pathlib.Path.I think the
furlapproach is good. I should not have written my function signature assignature=(path, append_trailing_slash=false)but rather assignature=(url, append_trailing_slash=false)because the argument can be a relative or absolute url, not just path.IMO, we can have
Url.join()for URL joining, similar tofurl.furl.join, andUrl.__truediv__for the sole purpose of adding a path without a trailing slash, just likefurl.furl.__truediv__.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Viicos @davidhewitt
Any update on this?