Skip to content

CSS refactoring #17

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 15, 2023
Merged

CSS refactoring #17

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 15, 2023

Conversation

@andrewhong04
Copy link
Member

@andrewhong04 andrewhong04 commented Mar 12, 2023

No description provided.

@andrewhong04 andrewhong04 marked this pull request as draft March 12, 2023 02:41
@andrewhong04 andrewhong04 added Topic.Code-Quality For issues/PRs that deal with code quality and cleanliness Topic.Code-Core For non-specific things related to the core/foundational codebase Type.Enhancement Improvements to existing features PR.Draft A PR that is a draft Impact.Large This is drastic and will have large implications on the codebase labels Mar 12, 2023
@andrewhong04 andrewhong04 marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2023 02:33
@andrewhong04 andrewhong04 merged commit ab4a455 into main Apr 15, 2023
@andrewhong04 andrewhong04 changed the title Some design changes & CSS refactoring CSS refactoring Apr 15, 2023
@andrewhong04 andrewhong04 deleted the css-cleanup branch April 27, 2023 16:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Impact.Large This is drastic and will have large implications on the codebase PR.Draft A PR that is a draft Topic.Code-Core For non-specific things related to the core/foundational codebase Topic.Code-Quality For issues/PRs that deal with code quality and cleanliness Type.Enhancement Improvements to existing features

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@andrewhong04