Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Feb 15, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Streamlined the way execution parameters and metadata are managed across task executors, enhancing configuration clarity and maintainability without affecting end-user functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes refactor how process keyword arguments are managed across several executor classes. A new instance variable _process_kwargs is introduced and used to store parameters that were previously passed inline. In the ExecutorBase class, the info property now copies and filters this dictionary. Similar refactoring has been applied in the FileExecutor, ExecutorWithDependencies, InteractiveExecutor, and InteractiveStepExecutor classes to consolidate and streamline the configuration and thread initialization logic.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
executorlib/base/executor.py Introduced a new instance variable _process_kwargs; updated the info property to use this variable (copying and filtering out "future_queue") and removed old _process attribute access. The submit signature was contextually updated.
executorlib/cache/executor.py Added a private _process_kwargs attribute to consolidate thread parameters, replacing an inline kwargs dictionary. The dictionary now holds keys such as future_queue, execute_function, cache_directory, resource_dict, etc.
executorlib/interactive/executor.py Refactored the ExecutorWithDependencies class by replacing an inline kwargs definition for thread execution with a new instance variable _process_kwargs, maintaining keys like "future_queue", "executor_queue", "executor", and "refresh_rate".
executorlib/interactive/shared.py In InteractiveExecutor, executor configuration data is now assigned to _process_kwargs, and in InteractiveStepExecutor, the initialization updates multiple keys (e.g., future_queue, spawner, max_cores, max_workers) via an update method.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant Client
  participant Executor
  participant Thread

  Client->>Executor: submit(task, args, resource_dict)
  Executor->>Executor: Initialize _process_kwargs
  Executor->>Thread: Start thread with _process_kwargs
  Thread->>Thread: Retrieve & filter kwargs (remove "future_queue")
  Thread-->>Executor: Return task execution info
  Executor-->>Client: Provide task result / metadata
Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a coder's delight,
Bouncing through changes, light and bright.
My code now hops with kwargs new,
Cleaner paths and logic true!
With a twitch of my nose, I cheer—
For refactored changes, oh so dear!
🐰💻✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 79f3140 and bac47a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • executorlib/base/executor.py (2 hunks)
  • executorlib/cache/executor.py (1 hunks)
  • executorlib/interactive/executor.py (1 hunks)
  • executorlib/interactive/shared.py (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.10)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_win
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
executorlib/interactive/executor.py (1)

43-48: LGTM! Improved code organization.

The changes consolidate thread configuration into a class-level attribute _process_kwargs, making the code more maintainable while preserving the same functionality.

Also applies to: 52-52

executorlib/cache/executor.py (1)

66-75: LGTM! Improved code organization.

The changes consolidate thread configuration into a class-level attribute _process_kwargs, making the code more maintainable while preserving the same functionality.

Also applies to: 79-79

executorlib/base/executor.py (1)

30-30: LGTM! Improved metadata handling.

The changes introduce a centralized configuration store via _process_kwargs and streamline metadata retrieval in the info property, making the code more maintainable while preserving backward compatibility.

Also applies to: 43-45

executorlib/interactive/shared.py (2)

155-155: LGTM! Improved code organization in InteractiveExecutor.

The changes consolidate executor configuration into a class-level attribute _process_kwargs, making the code more maintainable while preserving the same functionality.


209-217: LGTM! Improved code organization in InteractiveStepExecutor.

The changes:

  • Consolidate executor configuration into a class-level attribute _process_kwargs.
  • Use update method to streamline multiple assignments.
  • Make the code more maintainable while preserving the same functionality.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.91%. Comparing base (79f3140) to head (bac47a5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #586      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.92%   95.91%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          26       26              
  Lines        1177     1176       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         1129     1128       -1     
  Misses         48       48              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 3befb3f into main Feb 15, 2025
30 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the fix_kwargs branch February 15, 2025 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants