Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Jul 12, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated internal backend identifiers for improved consistency across task schedulers and cluster executors.
    • Adjusted default backend values and added flexibility for task execution methods.

No changes to user-facing functionality or interfaces.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 12, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

The changes update the backend string arguments passed to the create_file_executor function and related constructors in Flux and Slurm executor modules, changing them from "flux_submission" to "flux" and from "slurm_submission" to "slurm". The default backend value in create_file_executor is also updated from "flux_submission" to None, and the backend argument is passed directly without string manipulation. Additionally, an execute_function parameter with a default is added to create_file_executor and passed to FileTaskScheduler.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
executorlib/executor/flux.py,
executorlib/executor/slurm.py
Changed backend argument in create_file_executor from "flux_submission"/"slurm_submission" to "flux"/"slurm" in respective executor constructors.
executorlib/task_scheduler/file/task_scheduler.py Changed default backend in create_file_executor from "flux_submission" to None; added execute_function parameter with default; passed backend directly without splitting to FileTaskScheduler; passed execute_function to FileTaskScheduler.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant FluxClusterExecutor
    participant create_file_executor
    participant FileTaskScheduler

    User->>FluxClusterExecutor: instantiate(plot_dependency_graph=False)
    FluxClusterExecutor->>create_file_executor: backend="flux"
    create_file_executor->>FileTaskScheduler: backend="flux", execute_function=default
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant SlurmClusterExecutor
    participant create_file_executor
    participant FileTaskScheduler

    User->>SlurmClusterExecutor: instantiate()
    SlurmClusterExecutor->>create_file_executor: backend="slurm"
    create_file_executor->>FileTaskScheduler: backend="slurm", execute_function=default
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A hop and a skip, the backend names shift,
From "flux_submission" to "flux"—what a swift lift!
Slurm joins the fun, its suffix now gone,
Executors align, their naming redrawn.
With strings now concise, the code’s looking nice—
A rabbit’s delight, in backend device!
🐇✨
"""


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 76f1c09 and 6660a06.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • executorlib/task_scheduler/file/task_scheduler.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • executorlib/task_scheduler/file/task_scheduler.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (14)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_win
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_openmpi
  • GitHub Check: notebooks
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_mpich
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_old
  • GitHub Check: notebooks_integration
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.89%. Comparing base (957170b) to head (6660a06).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #713   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.89%   96.89%           
=======================================
  Files          29       29           
  Lines        1320     1320           
=======================================
  Hits         1279     1279           
  Misses         41       41           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 4458c86 into main Jul 12, 2025
30 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the create_file_executor branch July 12, 2025 09:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants