-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
add notebook to explain testing and debug capabilities #751
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
WalkthroughA new "Testing and Debugging" documentation link was added to the README under the "Single Node Executor" section. The single-node example notebook was updated with minor changes to output timings, formatting, and metadata, but no code logic or explanations were altered. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (16)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #751 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.47% 97.47%
=======================================
Files 32 32
Lines 1423 1423
=======================================
Hits 1387 1387
Misses 36 36 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
notebooks/6-testing.ipynb (3)
69-70: Consolidate duplicate imports.The
SingleNodeExecutorimport is duplicated from the previous section. Consider consolidating imports at the beginning of the notebook.
106-109: Consider usingcontextlib.suppressfor cleaner exception handling.While the current try/except pattern works for educational purposes, you could demonstrate a more pythonic approach.
- try: - print([f.result() for f in future_lst]) - except ValueError: - pass + from contextlib import suppress + with suppress(ValueError): + print([f.result() for f in future_lst])
219-225: Remove empty code cell.The empty code cell at the end serves no purpose and should be removed to keep the notebook clean.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
notebooks/6-testing.ipynb(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.12.2)
notebooks/6-testing.ipynb
27-30: Use contextlib.suppress(ValueError) instead of try-except-pass
Replace with contextlib.suppress(ValueError)
(SIM105)
37-37: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.
(B018)
40-40: Module level import not at top of file
(E402)
46-46: Module level import not at top of file
(E402)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
notebooks/6-testing.ipynb (8)
1-11: Good introduction that sets clear context.The introduction effectively explains the purpose of the notebook and why testing/debugging utilities are important when scaling to HPC environments.
12-52: Effective demonstration of object size logging.The example clearly shows how to enable object size logging and what output to expect. The use of context manager is appropriate.
79-84: Function demonstrates error conditions effectively.The example function clearly shows how specific input combinations can trigger exceptions, which is perfect for demonstrating error logging capabilities.
127-164: Good demonstration of error log content inspection.The example effectively shows how the error log captures function details, arguments, and full traceback information, which is valuable for debugging.
181-185: Proper cleanup of test files.Good practice to clean up the error log file after demonstrating its usage.
187-194: Excellent explanation of TestClusterExecutor's purpose.The explanation clearly articulates why TestClusterExecutor is needed and how it differs from other executors. This provides valuable context for users debugging cluster execution issues.
197-216: Clear demonstration of TestClusterExecutor usage.The example shows the basic usage pattern and demonstrates that it works similarly to other executors while using file-based communication internally.
226-249: Standard and appropriate notebook metadata.The metadata configuration is correct for a modern Jupyter notebook with Python 3.12.
Summary by CodeRabbit