Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Jul 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a "Testing and Debugging" link to the documentation index in the README.
    • Updated the example notebook with refreshed runtime outputs and minor formatting adjustments; no changes to code or explanations.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Walkthrough

A new "Testing and Debugging" documentation link was added to the README under the "Single Node Executor" section. The single-node example notebook was updated with minor changes to output timings, formatting, and metadata, but no code logic or explanations were altered.

Changes

Cohort Change Summary
README.md Added a "Testing and Debugging" documentation link under the "Single Node Executor" section.
notebooks/1-single-node.ipynb Updated output timings, whitespace, formatting, and metadata; no changes to code or explanations.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A hop through docs, a leap in code,
New links for those who debug and probe.
Timings refreshed, outputs aligned—
The SingleNode bunny is quite refined!
With whiskers twitching, it’s ready to show,
How seamless updates help knowledge grow. 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 644ffa5 and da81973.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • notebooks/1-single-node.ipynb (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • README.md
  • notebooks/1-single-node.ipynb
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (16)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_slurm_mpich
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_win
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_openmpi
  • GitHub Check: notebooks
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_mpich
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)
  • GitHub Check: notebooks_integration
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch testdoc

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.47%. Comparing base (1c5b190) to head (da81973).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #751   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.47%   97.47%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        1423     1423           
=======================================
  Hits         1387     1387           
  Misses         36       36           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
notebooks/6-testing.ipynb (3)

69-70: Consolidate duplicate imports.

The SingleNodeExecutor import is duplicated from the previous section. Consider consolidating imports at the beginning of the notebook.


106-109: Consider using contextlib.suppress for cleaner exception handling.

While the current try/except pattern works for educational purposes, you could demonstrate a more pythonic approach.

-    try:
-        print([f.result() for f in future_lst])
-    except ValueError:
-        pass
+    from contextlib import suppress
+    with suppress(ValueError):
+        print([f.result() for f in future_lst])

219-225: Remove empty code cell.

The empty code cell at the end serves no purpose and should be removed to keep the notebook clean.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 81a0b73 and 644ffa5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • notebooks/6-testing.ipynb (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.12.2)
notebooks/6-testing.ipynb

27-30: Use contextlib.suppress(ValueError) instead of try-except-pass

Replace with contextlib.suppress(ValueError)

(SIM105)


37-37: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.

(B018)


40-40: Module level import not at top of file

(E402)


46-46: Module level import not at top of file

(E402)

🔇 Additional comments (8)
notebooks/6-testing.ipynb (8)

1-11: Good introduction that sets clear context.

The introduction effectively explains the purpose of the notebook and why testing/debugging utilities are important when scaling to HPC environments.


12-52: Effective demonstration of object size logging.

The example clearly shows how to enable object size logging and what output to expect. The use of context manager is appropriate.


79-84: Function demonstrates error conditions effectively.

The example function clearly shows how specific input combinations can trigger exceptions, which is perfect for demonstrating error logging capabilities.


127-164: Good demonstration of error log content inspection.

The example effectively shows how the error log captures function details, arguments, and full traceback information, which is valuable for debugging.


181-185: Proper cleanup of test files.

Good practice to clean up the error log file after demonstrating its usage.


187-194: Excellent explanation of TestClusterExecutor's purpose.

The explanation clearly articulates why TestClusterExecutor is needed and how it differs from other executors. This provides valuable context for users debugging cluster execution issues.


197-216: Clear demonstration of TestClusterExecutor usage.

The example shows the basic usage pattern and demonstrates that it works similarly to other executors while using file-based communication internally.


226-249: Standard and appropriate notebook metadata.

The metadata configuration is correct for a modern Jupyter notebook with Python 3.12.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 3b8627c into main Jul 27, 2025
31 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the testdoc branch July 27, 2025 20:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants