Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Aug 5, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Updated plotting-related function names throughout the application and tests for improved clarity and consistency.
  • Tests

    • Updated test imports and function calls to use the new plotting function names. No changes to test logic or outcomes.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jan-janssen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0af5c2e and adb59f2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • executorlib/standalone/plot.py (3 hunks)
  • executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py (3 hunks)

Walkthrough

The changes focus on renaming plotting-related functions in the executorlib/standalone/plot.py module to more descriptive names. All relevant imports and function calls in dependent modules and test files are updated accordingly. No internal logic, parameters, or control flow is altered—only function names and their usage are changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Plotting Function Renames
executorlib/standalone/plot.py
Renamed three plotting functions to more descriptive names; no changes to logic or signatures.
Scheduler Dependency Updates
executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py
Updated imports and function calls to use new plotting function names.
Flux Executor Plot Tests
tests/test_fluxjobexecutor_plot.py
Updated imports and calls from old plotting function name to new one in all relevant test methods.
Single Node Executor Plot Tests
tests/test_singlenodeexecutor_plot_dependency.py
Updated imports and calls from old plotting function name to new one in all relevant test methods.
Test Cluster Executor Plot Test
tests/test_testclusterexecutor.py
Updated import and single function call to use the new plotting function name.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐇
With names now clear as morning dew,
Plotting functions shine anew!
From graphs to hashes, all aligned,
Descriptions crisp, their roles defined.
Tests and code in tidy rows—
Hopping forward, clarity grows!
🌱✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch plot

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.65%. Comparing base (52e44f3) to head (adb59f2).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #776   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.65%   97.65%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        1451     1451           
=======================================
  Hits         1417     1417           
  Misses         34       34           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (9)
tests/test_singlenodeexecutor_plot_dependency.py (6)

125-130: See earlier comment – identical change.


142-147: See earlier comment – identical change.


170-175: See earlier comment – identical change.


215-220: See earlier comment – identical change.


241-246: See earlier comment – identical change.


284-289: See earlier comment – identical change.

tests/test_fluxjobexecutor_plot.py (3)

103-108: See previous call – same change.


129-134: See previous call – same change.


172-177: See previous call – same change.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
executorlib/standalone/plot.py (1)

8-20: Function renamed; consider updating __all__ for public API clarity

Renaming is fine, but if this module intends to expose a stable public surface, an __all__ list would make the exported names explicit.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 52e44f3 and 0af5c2e.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • executorlib/standalone/plot.py (3 hunks)
  • executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/test_fluxjobexecutor_plot.py (5 hunks)
  • tests/test_singlenodeexecutor_plot_dependency.py (8 hunks)
  • tests/test_testclusterexecutor.py (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_win
  • GitHub Check: notebooks
  • GitHub Check: notebooks_integration
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_old
  • GitHub Check: unittest_slurm_mpich
🔇 Additional comments (11)
tests/test_testclusterexecutor.py (2)

7-7: Import correctly updated to new helper name

The renamed symbol generate_nodes_and_edges_for_plotting is imported from the expected location and keeps the test in sync with the plot helper API.


86-91: Call site aligns with new API – no further action

The call was renamed consistently and positional arguments remain correct (task_hash_dict, future_hash_inverse_dict).

tests/test_singlenodeexecutor_plot_dependency.py (2)

10-10: Updated import reflects helper rename
No issues – import path and symbol are correct.


64-69: First call site updated – counts & semantics unchanged
The helper is invoked with the same arguments; nothing else to flag.

tests/test_fluxjobexecutor_plot.py (2)

6-6: Import brought in line with renamed helper
No further issues detected.


58-63: Helper call renamed – arguments correct.

executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py (3)

147-153: Hash generation now uses new helper – matches rename
Call arguments are unchanged; return value feeds directly into _future_hash_dict as before.


208-218: Graph-building pipeline updated end-to-end

generate_nodes_and_edges_for_plotting and the plot_dependency_graph wrapper are chained correctly, preserving previous behaviour.


15-18: No leftover helper references found after renaming
The grep results only match networkx’s .draw() calls in executorlib/standalone/plot.py (lines 158 & 162). There are no occurrences of the old names (generate_nodes_and_edges_for_plotting, generate_task_hash_for_plotting, or plot_dependency_graph). Everything looks consistent.

executorlib/standalone/plot.py (2)

84-86: Consistent naming – keep docstring tags in sync
Docstring reflects the new name; looks good.


137-139: Top-level draw helper renamed; no logic changes
Implementation untouched, rename is consistent.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 64f3897 into main Aug 5, 2025
54 of 55 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the plot branch August 5, 2025 08:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants