Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Aug 31, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated example import paths to match the current package structure for interactive task schedulers (including block-allocation and one-to-one variants).
    • Ensures copy-paste examples work as-is and align with the latest module layout.
    • No behavior, runtime, or API changes; this is a documentation-only update.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 31, 2025

Walkthrough

Docstring examples in two task scheduler modules were updated to reflect new import paths under executorlib.task_scheduler.interactive. No code or behavior changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Docstring import path updates
executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py, executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py
Updated example import paths in docstrings from executorlib.interactive... to executorlib.task_scheduler.interactive.... No logic changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I twitch my whiskers at paths anew,
Hop-hop through modules, tidy and true.
No gears reworked, no logic to chase—
Just clearer trails in the import place.
Carrots aligned, docs shining bright,
A lighter leap for builds tonight. 🥕

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch docstring

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 31, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.75%. Comparing base (dcf3961) to head (2c51a4e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #799   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.75%   97.75%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        1468     1468           
=======================================
  Hits         1435     1435           
  Misses         33       33           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py (2)

20-24: Fix typos and minor wording in the class docstring.

  • "exeutorlib" → "executorlib"
  • "python" → "Python"
  • "to improves" → "to improve"

Apply this minimal diff:

-    The executorlib.interactive.executor.InteractiveExecutor leverages the exeutorlib executor to distribute python
+    The executorlib.interactive.executor.InteractiveExecutor leverages the executorlib executor to distribute Python
@@
-    In contrast to the mpi4py.futures.MPIPoolExecutor the
+    In contrast to the mpi4py.futures.MPIPoolExecutor, the
@@
-    Consequently, it is primarily an abstraction of its functionality to
-    improves the usability in particular when used in combination with Jupyter notebooks.
+    Consequently, it is primarily an abstraction of its functionality to
+    improve the usability, in particular when used in combination with Jupyter notebooks.

197-197: Grammar: “single tasks” → “single task”.

-    Execute a single tasks in parallel using the message passing interface (MPI).
+    Execute a single task in parallel using the message passing interface (MPI).
executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py (3)

14-18: Tighten wording and capitalization; confirm reference path.

  • "python" → "Python"
  • Add comma after MPIPoolExecutor.
  • Consider updating references from executorlib.interactive.executor.InteractiveStepExecutor to the new package path if it also moved.
-    tasks. In contrast to the mpi4py.futures.MPIPoolExecutor the executorlib.interactive.executor.InteractiveStepExecutor
-    can be executed in a serial python process and does not require the python script to be executed with MPI.
+    tasks. In contrast to the mpi4py.futures.MPIPoolExecutor, the executorlib.interactive.executor.InteractiveStepExecutor
+    can be executed in a serial Python process and does not require the Python script to be executed with MPI.

Please confirm whether InteractiveStepExecutor also resides under executorlib.task_scheduler.interactive.* and update accordingly if needed.


80-80: Grammar: “single tasks” → “single task”.

-    Execute a single tasks in parallel using the message passing interface (MPI).
+    Execute a single task in parallel using the message passing interface (MPI).

231-231: Duplicate grammar nit: “single tasks” → “single task”.

-    Execute a single tasks in parallel using the message passing interface (MPI).
+    Execute a single task in parallel using the message passing interface (MPI).
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dcf3961 and 2c51a4e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py (1 hunks)
  • executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (14)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-24.04-arm, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_mpich
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_openmpi
  • GitHub Check: minimal
  • GitHub Check: unittest_old
  • GitHub Check: unittest_slurm_mpich
  • GitHub Check: unittest_win
  • GitHub Check: notebooks_integration
  • GitHub Check: notebooks
🔇 Additional comments (2)
executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py (1)

34-34: Docstring import path fix looks correct.

Import now matches the task_scheduler.interactive namespace.

executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py (1)

28-28: Docstring import path fix looks correct.

Import now points to executorlib.task_scheduler.interactive.onetoone.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 2842dd4 into main Aug 31, 2025
61 of 63 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the docstring branch August 31, 2025 16:38
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants