Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Sep 7, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Continuous integration workflow updated: increased the timeout for the SLURM setup step in the unittest job from 5 to 10 minutes. This helps accommodate slower runners and stabilizes automated test execution in certain environments.
    • No changes to application behavior or public APIs. End users will not see any interface or feature differences.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow file was updated to increase the timeout for the koesterlab/setup-slurm-action@v1 step in the unittest_slurm_mpich job from 5 to 10 minutes. No other changes were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI workflow timeout adjustment
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml
Increased timeout-minutes for the koesterlab/setup-slurm-action@v1 step in unittest_slurm_mpich job from 5 to 10.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A hop, a pause, then longer still,
Our runners stretch atop the hill.
Ten-minute carrots on the vine,
The CI burrow’s doing fine.
Thump-thump—timeouts realigned,
More time to chomp, then cross the line! 🥕

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch slurm_time_out_extension

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml (1)

278-279: Fix minor typo and prefer apt-get for non-interactive CI installs.

Rename the step and use apt-get with update to avoid intermittent failures.

-    - name: ubnuntu install
-      run: sudo apt install -y mpich
+    - name: Ubuntu install MPICH
+      run: |
+        sudo apt-get update
+        sudo apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends mpich
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e05297e and 07ecbb8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pipeline.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml (1)

277-277: SLURM setup timeout increase to 10 minutes looks good.

This should reduce spurious failures from slow SLURM bring-up on shared runners.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 7, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.76%. Comparing base (e05297e) to head (07ecbb8).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #809   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.76%   97.76%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        1479     1479           
=======================================
  Hits         1446     1446           
  Misses         33       33           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit f1847a0 into main Sep 7, 2025
62 of 63 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the slurm_time_out_extension branch September 7, 2025 11:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants