Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Nov 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a new resource link for "Advanced Scheduling" in the Single Node Executor documentation section.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2025

Walkthrough

A new documentation link for "Advanced Scheduling" was added to the Single Node Executor section in README.md, expanding the available topics reference without structural changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Update
README.md
Added "Advanced Scheduling" link entry under Single Node Executor documentation

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A link springs forth in the README garden,
Advanced Scheduling now guides the way,
One small addition, one helpful mention—
Documentation hops brighter today! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'fix documentation' is vague and generic. While it relates to the changeset (which adds a documentation link), it does not clearly specify what documentation was fixed or what the main change is. Use a more specific title such as 'Add Advanced Scheduling link to Single Node Executor documentation' to clearly describe the actual change made.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fixdocs

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 90dbef3 and 5b4ffe3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (16)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-22.04-arm, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-24.04-arm, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: notebooks_integration
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_mpich
  • GitHub Check: notebooks
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-22.04-arm, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_openmpi
  • GitHub Check: unittest_win
  • GitHub Check: unittest_slurm_mpich
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

137-137: Link target verified and correct.

The documentation link in README.md line 137 is valid. The "Advanced Scheduling" section exists in the source notebook notebooks/1-single-node.ipynb and will build to the correct HTML anchor via Jupyter Book and ReadTheDocs.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.26%. Comparing base (90dbef3) to head (5b4ffe3).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #858   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.26%   93.26%           
=======================================
  Files          38       38           
  Lines        1796     1796           
=======================================
  Hits         1675     1675           
  Misses        121      121           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit c9ad866 into main Nov 13, 2025
61 of 63 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the fixdocs branch November 13, 2025 06:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants