Update hatch-vsc to 0.5.0

[jan-janssen]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated development build tooling dependencies.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Bumps hatch-vcs dependency from version 0.4.0 to 0.5.0 across two CI support environment configuration files. No other dependency changes or structural modifications observed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CI environment dependency upgrades .ci_support/environment.yml, .ci_support/environment_mini.yml	Upgraded hatch-vcs dependency from 0.4.0 to 0.5.0 in both conda environment specifications.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Straightforward dependency version bump affecting only static configuration files with no logic or behavioral changes.

Possibly related PRs

• Switch from versioneer to hatchling #379: Directly related as it performs the same hatch-vcs version upgrade (0.4.0 → 0.5.0) in the same CI environment configuration files.

Poem

🐰 A version bumped with gentle care,
From 0.4.0 to 0.5 so fair,
Hatch-vcs now plays its part,
Building CI pipelines with heart! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request title states "Update hatch-vsc to 0.5.0," but the actual package being updated in both environment files is "hatch-vcs" (not "hatch-vsc"). This is a spelling error in the title—the package name is incorrect, which creates a mismatch between what the title claims and what the changeset actually contains. While the general intent of the title is clear (updating a hatch-related package), the inaccurate package name means the title does not precisely match the actual changes and could mislead developers scanning the commit history.	Correct the title to read "Update hatch-vcs to 0.5.0" (changing "hatch-vsc" to "hatch-vcs") to accurately reflect the actual package name being updated in the changeset. This will ensure the title precisely matches the changes and maintains clarity for future reference.
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch hatch

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0683e24 and 66d3171.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .ci_support/environment.yml (1 hunks)
• .ci_support/environment_mini.yml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (windows-latest, 3.13, win-64-py-3-13)
• GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (macos-latest, 3.13, osx-64-py-3-13)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.ci_support/environment_mini.yml (1)

9-9: Consistent with parallel environment file.

The version bump mirrors the change in .ci_support/environment.yml, ensuring both CI environment configurations remain in sync. Good practice.

.ci_support/environment.yml (1)

22-22: hatch-vcs 0.5.0 bump is compatible and safe.

The version bump drops Python 3.8 support, but the project already requires Python >=3.9 (pyproject.toml). Version 0.5.0 adds official support for Python 3.13, which aligns with the project's classifier list. No security vulnerabilities were found.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.89%. Comparing base (0683e24) to head (66d3171).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #411   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.89%   82.89%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        1818     1818           
=======================================
  Hits         1507     1507           
  Misses        311      311           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.