Skip to content

Conversation

@divyag9
Copy link
Contributor

@divyag9 divyag9 commented May 6, 2019

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Our records indicate we have not received your CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day
before our records are updated.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for your contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels May 6, 2019
Copy link
Member

@ericvsmith ericvsmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other than my comments, this looks good. Thanks!

.. method:: generator.__next__()

Starts the execution of a generator function or resumes it at the last
executed yield expression. When a generator function is resumed with a
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the original "a" is correct here, although I realize there's some wiggle room.

The operators :keyword:`is` and :keyword:`is not` test for object identity: ``x
is y`` is true if and only if *x* and *y* are the same object. Object identity
The operators :keyword:`is` and :keyword:`is not` test for object's identity: ``x
is y`` is true if and only if *x* and *y* are the same object. Object's identity
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And same here: "An object's identity ..."


The operators :keyword:`is` and :keyword:`is not` test for object identity: ``x
is y`` is true if and only if *x* and *y* are the same object. Object identity
The operators :keyword:`is` and :keyword:`is not` test for object's identity: ``x
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would make this "test for an object's identity" (adding "an").

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@divyag9
Copy link
Contributor Author

divyag9 commented May 6, 2019

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@ericvsmith: please review the changes made to this pull request.

Copy link
Member

@ericvsmith ericvsmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks!

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @divyag9 for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request May 13, 2019
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-13279 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

@csabella
Copy link
Contributor

@divyag9 Congratulations on getting your PR merged! 🎉 🎉

matrixise pushed a commit to matrixise/cpython that referenced this pull request May 13, 2019
JulienPalard pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2019
@divyag9
Copy link
Contributor Author

divyag9 commented May 14, 2019

@divyag9 Congratulations on getting your PR merged! 🎉 🎉

Thanks Cheryl(@csabella)! Thanks for all your help

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants