Skip to content

Conversation

@skrah
Copy link
Contributor

@skrah skrah commented Feb 23, 2020

I've noticed that people in the scientific ecosystem meticulously credit their contributions in source files, probably for good reason. :-)

cc @pitrou @ncoghlan in case I got something wrong.

Copy link
Member

@pitrou pitrou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 from me.

@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you! :)

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

@skrah: Please replace # with GH- in the commit message next time. Thanks!

@skrah
Copy link
Contributor Author

skrah commented Feb 24, 2020

Thanks for taking a look!

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @skrah for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @skrah for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

I'm having trouble backporting to 3.7. Reason: 'Error 110 while writing to socket. Connection timed out.'. Please retry by removing and re-adding the needs backport to 3.7 label.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-18642 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @skrah for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-18643 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
(cherry picked from commit ee3bac4)

Co-authored-by: Stefan Krah <skrah@bytereef.org>
sthagen added a commit to sthagen/python-cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
Give proper credits for the memoryview implementation. (python#18626)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants