gh-141617: Add missing result() call in concurrent.futures example #141620
+7
−3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bedevere-app
bot
added
awaiting review
docs
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes an incomplete code example in the concurrent.futures documentation.
The second example in the deadlock section was missing a
.result()call on the executor.submit() invocation, which is necessary to demonstrate the deadlock behavior described in the comment.Changes:
.result()call to complete the example in Doc/library/concurrent.futures.rstFixes #141617
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--141620.org.readthedocs.build/