PEP 432: Update for C99 initializers #12
Conversation
|
@ericsnowcurrently Care to take a quick look at this one before I merge it? They're the updates I was working on during the PyCon sprints, but didn't get around to publishing. |
brettcannon
changed the title
|
Tweaked the title to mention this is a WIP so no one accepts this PR by accident while @ncoghlan waits to hear from @ericsnowcurrently . |
| which, by default, operates in "isolated mode" (as selected by the CPython | ||
| ``-I`` switch). | ||
| ``-I`` switch), as well as the creation of an example stub binary that just | ||
| runs an appended zip archive (permitting single-file pure Python executables) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From what I recall, Thomas indicated that there were some problems with this approach which required sticking the archive into the elf data section. It sounded like that was something different than just appending the zip archive.
brettcannon
changed the title
|
Just closing/reopening this so Travis will pick it up. |
|
What's the status of this PR, @ncoghlan ? |
|
This still needs the additional explanations mentioned in the discussion between @ericsnowcurrently and myself - merging as is would be a little confusing as to the rationale for some of the revised design decisions. Addressing that is sitting somewhere on the todo list :) |
|
Should this get closed and moved over to someone's personal fork until it's ready for being merged? |
ncoghlan
changed the title
|
The remaining work was a "I need to better explain the rationale for this approach", but there's no need to hold the PR open for that. |
|
I moved the TODO aspect over to my sandbox repo: https://bitbucket.org/ncoghlan/cpython_sandbox/issues/3/pep-432-update-to-consistently-use-object |
5 participants
No description provided.