PEP 627: Bring back the REQUESTED file #1549
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As pip now implements REQUESTED, the main reason to remove the file is gone, so I'm adding it back as it is in PEP 376. Possibly fixing the semantics is left to another PEP.
AA-Turner
pushed a commit
to AA-Turner/peps
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2020
As pip now implements REQUESTED, the main reason to remove the file is gone, so I'm adding it back as it is in PEP 376. Possibly fixing the semantics is left to another PEP.
mnm678
pushed a commit
to mnm678/peps
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2020
As pip now implements REQUESTED, the main reason to remove the file is gone, so I'm adding it back as it is in PEP 376. Possibly fixing the semantics is left to another PEP.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As pip now implements REQUESTED, the main reason to remove the file is gone,
so I'm adding it back as it is in PEP 376.
Possibly fixing the semantics is left to another PEP.