PEP 679: Mark as Rejected

[StanFromIreland]

• SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
• Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
• Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
• Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)
• Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
• Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

😢

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4673.org.readthedocs.build/

[hugovk]

Thank you.

[AA-Turner]

It would be good to add a brief précis of the rejection reasons, perhaps.

A

[StanFromIreland]

It would essentially be a duplicate of Greg's well worded and summarised post, so I didn't see a need. If you want to, go ahead, I'll happily review.

[pablogsal]

🫡