Skip to content

Conversation

@SaoirseARM
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Adds capability to annotator ops with more than one input i.e cat/stack
  • Adds some missing data layout ops to generic_annotator
  • Removes Quantize_io from tests which are covered by generic annotator
  • Removes duplicates from is_share_obs_or_fq_op

- Adds capability to annotator ops with more than one input
- Adds some missing data layout ops to generic_annotator
- Removes Quantize_io from tests which are covered by generic annotator
- Removes duplicates from is_share_obs_or_fq_op
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 25, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/6494

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 6f873c4 with merge base c045c35 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Oct 25, 2024
@SaoirseARM
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot label ciflow/trunk

@SaoirseARM
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot label 'partner: arm'

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the partner: arm For backend delegation, kernels, demo, etc. from the 3rd-party partner, Arm label Oct 25, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@digantdesai has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@digantdesai
Copy link
Contributor

Found issues internally, can you please fix it? 🙏

executorch/backends/arm/quantizer/quantization_annotation/generic_annotator.py:83:18 Incompatible parameter type [6]: In call `_annotate_input_qspec_map`, for 2nd positional argument, expected `Node` but got `Union[List[Node], Node]`.
executorch/backends/arm/quantizer/quantization_annotation/generic_annotator.py:85:58 Incompatible parameter type [6]: In call `torch.ao.quantization.quantizer.quantizer.SharedQuantizationSpec.__init__`, for 1st positional argument, expected `Union[Tuple[Node, Node], Node]` but got `Tuple[Union[List[Node], Node], typing.Any]`.

@SaoirseARM
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Found issues internally, can you please fix it? 🙏

executorch/backends/arm/quantizer/quantization_annotation/generic_annotator.py:83:18 Incompatible parameter type [6]: In call `_annotate_input_qspec_map`, for 2nd positional argument, expected `Node` but got `Union[List[Node], Node]`.
executorch/backends/arm/quantizer/quantization_annotation/generic_annotator.py:85:58 Incompatible parameter type [6]: In call `torch.ao.quantization.quantizer.quantizer.SharedQuantizationSpec.__init__`, for 1st positional argument, expected `Union[Tuple[Node, Node], Node]` but got `Tuple[Union[List[Node], Node], typing.Any]`.

Apologies for the delay on this! It should be fixed now.

Thanks,
Saoirse

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@digantdesai has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit b8e0ef9 into pytorch:main Nov 6, 2024
103 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. partner: arm For backend delegation, kernels, demo, etc. from the 3rd-party partner, Arm

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants