Fix uninitialized variable type-check in FuseQuantizedActivationPass #7671
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Tessil
added
the
partner: arm
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/7671
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 0bb3384 with merge base 0dba025 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
Tessil
force-pushed
the
toupstream/fused_activation_type_fix
branch
from
ecb76ca to
0bb3384
Compare
freddan80
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2025
YIWENX14
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes the
Uninitialized localtype-checking error inFuseQuantizedActivationPass: