Skip to content

Conversation

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

@swolchok swolchok commented Mar 8, 2025

(We should probably merge xnn_executor_runner and executor_runner if there's no particular use for a portable-only runner, but hey this is an incremental improvement.)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

swolchok commented Mar 8, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 8, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/9069

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit 7fcc04e with merge base 94a8bc7 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Mar 8, 2025
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2025
(We should probably merge xnn_executor_runner and executor_runner if there's no particular use for a portable-only runner, but hey this is an incremental improvement.)

ghstack-source-id: d453ac2
ghstack-comment-id: 2707875826
Pull Request resolved: #9069
endif()

if(EXECUTORCH_BUILD_KERNELS_CUSTOM)
list(APPEND xnn_executor_runner_libs custom_ops)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
list(APPEND xnn_executor_runner_libs custom_ops)
list(APPEND xnn_executor_runner_libs $<LINK_LIBRARY:WHOLE_ARCHIVE,custom_ops>)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The above diff works for me.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

[ghstack-poisoned]
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2025
(We should probably merge xnn_executor_runner and executor_runner if there's no particular use for a portable-only runner, but hey this is an incremental improvement.)

ghstack-source-id: 1f02005
ghstack-comment-id: 2707875826
Pull Request resolved: #9069
@swolchok swolchok requested a review from iseeyuan March 10, 2025 17:45
Copy link
Contributor

@iseeyuan iseeyuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's land it!

@swolchok swolchok merged commit 80c3f63 into main Mar 10, 2025
49 of 51 checks passed
@swolchok swolchok deleted the gh/swolchok/331/head branch March 10, 2025 23:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. topic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants