-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.7k
[Doc] Add sum reduction for CTCLoss #100235
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/100235
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit b731318: UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D45387774 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @isdanni
nit: could you also update the documentation for the shape of output per the comment on the linked issue please :)
Updated. I think the original output doc |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D45387774 |
978995a to
784739f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I missed that first scalar! Thank you so much for clarifying the docs! :)
|
Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as |
|
@pytorchbot rebase |
|
@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here |
|
Successfully rebased |
784739f to
5f849ad
Compare
|
@pytorchbot merge -f "build failures are unrelated" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#100235 Reference: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/39b885cbbfc8c115069d49f5a6d27ea622bd05dc/aten/src/ATen/native/LossCTC.cpp#L366-L371 Test Plan: See GitHub Tests. Differential Revision: D45387774 fbshipit-source-id: 8166f5ea0383312bce0df2d9ea53aed2edf551b4
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D45387774 |
5f849ad to
b731318
Compare
|
Thanks for merging this @mikaylagawarecki My other PR had a similar problem. Rebasing and export from Phabricator should do the trick. |
|
@pytorchbot merge -f "build failure is unrelated" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Summary:
Fix: #99141
Reference:
pytorch/aten/src/ATen/native/LossCTC.cpp
Lines 366 to 371 in 39b885c
Test Plan: See GitHub Tests.
Differential Revision: D45387774