-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Re-land: Break graph on manual_seed
.
#109109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/109109
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit b4a0c65 with merge base 129f535 ( BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Add support |
@anijain2305 I think this PR is ready for review. Could you take a look, if you have some time? |
@eellison @anijain2305 This is a friendly reminder. Do you have some time to take a look at this PR? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice targeted fix!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I re-requested a review on myself because I thought that there could be a way to trace through a program without having disabled manual_seed, but no, I think this can't happen without really bending Python imports.
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge failedReason: This PR needs a If not, please add the To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example For more information, see Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: Command
Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
@pytorchbot rebase -s |
@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here |
Rebase failed due to Command
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/6315677704 |
The CI failure seems to be coming from upstream. |
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are: Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud |
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are: Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud |
@pytorchbot merge -i |
Merge startedYour change will be merged while ignoring the following 1 checks: pull / linux-focal-py3.8-clang10 / test (dynamo, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge) Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
manual_seed
. #109109Re-landing: #108647 (old #107594)
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @Xia-Weiwen @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @peterbell10 @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @aakhundov @ColinPeppler @ngimel