Skip to content

Conversation

zou3519
Copy link
Contributor

@zou3519 zou3519 commented Sep 25, 2023

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

We want to use the same failures dict for multiple TestCase. This happens
common in e.g. fbgemm. To move towards that, we need to prefix each test name
with their test class to avoid ambiguity

Differential Revision: D49615962

We want to use the same failures dict for multiple TestCase. This happens
common in e.g. fbgemm. To move towards that, we need to prefix each test name
with their test class to avoid ambiguity

Differential Revision: [D49615962](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D49615962/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 25, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/110045

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit d10aae3 with merge base cd99cdc (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

zou3519 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
We want to use the same failures dict for multiple TestCase. This happens
common in e.g. fbgemm. To move towards that, we need to prefix each test name
with their test class to avoid ambiguity

Differential Revision: [D49615962](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D49615962/)

ghstack-source-id: 201870796
Pull Request resolved: #110045
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Sep 26, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@jeanschmidt
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot revert -c nosignal -m "breaking linux-focal-py3.8-clang10"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Can't revert PR that was landed via phabricator as D49615962. Please revert by going to the internal diff and clicking Unland.

@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor Author

zou3519 commented Sep 26, 2023

@jeanschmidt the test failure looks unrelated to this PR

@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor Author

zou3519 commented Sep 26, 2023

Original PR passed the tests:
image
I have noticed on the current string of test failures in the HUD, a different test fails each time, so the tests look flaky.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot revert -m="Diff reverted internally" -c="ghfirst"

This Pull Request has been reverted by a revert inside Meta. To re-land this change, please open another pull request, assign the same reviewers, fix the CI failures that caused the revert and make sure that the failing CI runs on the PR by applying the proper ciflow label (e.g., ciflow/trunk).)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@zou3519 your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2023
… test class (#110045)"

This reverts commit 76fcec7.

Reverted #110045 on behalf of https://github.com/facebook-github-bot due to Diff reverted internally ([comment](#110045 (comment)))
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/zou3519/731/head branch September 29, 2023 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged Reverted

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants