Skip to content

Conversation

LucasLLC
Copy link
Contributor

@LucasLLC LucasLLC commented Dec 12, 2023

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Dec 12, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/115660

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit a5194d6 with merge base 8885128 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the oncall: distributed Add this issue/PR to distributed oncall triage queue label Dec 12, 2023
@LucasLLC LucasLLC added the topic: not user facing topic category label Dec 12, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@wz337 wz337 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for the quick fix!

@LucasLLC
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Dec 12, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

guilhermeleobas pushed a commit to guilhermeleobas/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2023
…d` (pytorch#115660)

Fixes expected behavior when `no_dist=True` in `state_dict_loader.load`

Fixes pytorch#115591

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#115660
Approved by: https://github.com/wz337, https://github.com/fegin
dmenig pushed a commit to dmenig/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2023
…d` (pytorch#115660)

Fixes expected behavior when `no_dist=True` in `state_dict_loader.load`

Fixes pytorch#115591

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#115660
Approved by: https://github.com/wz337, https://github.com/fegin
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the use_no_dist_with_load branch February 19, 2024 02:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged oncall: distributed Add this issue/PR to distributed oncall triage queue release notes: distributed (checkpoint) topic: bug fixes topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[dist_cp] Using no_dist with load still requires a process group

4 participants