Skip to content

Conversation

tugsbayasgalan
Copy link
Contributor

@tugsbayasgalan tugsbayasgalan commented Mar 11, 2024

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Mar 11, 2024
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 11, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/121652

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (2 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit faad2df with merge base 39ed038 (image):

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Comment on lines +339 to +343
if use_pre_dispatch:
_check_graph(pre_dispatch=True)
_check_graph(pre_dispatch=False)
else:
_check_graph(pre_dispatch=False)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if use_pre_dispatch:
_check_graph(pre_dispatch=True)
_check_graph(pre_dispatch=False)
else:
_check_graph(pre_dispatch=False)
if use_pre_dispatch:
_check_graph(pre_dispatch=True)
_check_graph(pre_dispatch=False)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We actually want to test both of them in use_pre_dispatch case. Meaning, we will always test aot-dispatch and pre-dispatch is just additional check

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah -- the _check_graph(pre_dispatch=False) is outside of the if statement :P

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh hahaha

@tugsbayasgalan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Mar 11, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
In this PR, we create another dynamic test class for TestExport tests that basically serializes/deserializas pre-dispatch IR. I encountered 4 additional failures. But 3 of them are due to different operator showing up in the graph and only one legit failure which is tracked by another task internally.

Pull Request resolved: #121678
Approved by: https://github.com/angelayi
ghstack dependencies: #121652
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
Pull Request resolved: #121687
Approved by: https://github.com/avikchaudhuri
ghstack dependencies: #121652, #121678
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/tugsbayasgalan/193/head branch April 12, 2024 01:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants