Skip to content

Conversation

@jbschlosser
Copy link
Contributor

@jbschlosser jbschlosser commented Mar 28, 2024

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 28, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/122902

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit bc9f2a4 with merge base 1e8d4b3 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

jbschlosser added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2024
@jbschlosser jbschlosser requested review from vmoens and zou3519 March 28, 2024 17:03
Copy link
Contributor

@vmoens vmoens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jbschlosser jbschlosser added the topic: not user facing topic category label Mar 28, 2024
@jbschlosser
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Mar 28, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Comment on lines +423 to +424
values=torch.zeros(3, 3, device="meta"),
offsets=torch.zeros(3, device="meta", dtype=torch.int64),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible to add a test case for what vincent was running into?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried but wasn't able to repro it after #122704 landed. I decided to make the change here anyway to avoid any other unforeseen randomness-related problems

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2024
This broke [internal tests](https://www.internalfb.com/intern/test/844425064039866/) that run with unset `NDEBUG`. It wasn't initially caught because we don't test with unset `NDEBUG` in OSS CI.
Pull Request resolved: #122917
Approved by: https://github.com/soulitzer
ghstack dependencies: #122902
sanketpurandare pushed a commit to sanketpurandare/pytorch that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
sanketpurandare pushed a commit to sanketpurandare/pytorch that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
This broke [internal tests](https://www.internalfb.com/intern/test/844425064039866/) that run with unset `NDEBUG`. It wasn't initially caught because we don't test with unset `NDEBUG` in OSS CI.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#122917
Approved by: https://github.com/soulitzer
ghstack dependencies: pytorch#122902
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/jbschlosser/132/head branch April 28, 2024 01:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants