[AOTI] Fix a missing aoti_torch_check symbol issue #136669
Conversation
Summary: When Inductor generates cpp kernels, they should be pure cpp loops which are independent to libtorch as much as possible. Differential Revision: D63403473
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/136669
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 82d5fb9 with merge base 5a29a06 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63403473 |
|
@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally' (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally) |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
…rch#136775) Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#136775 pytorch#136669 didn't resolve all the internal test failures. Add more tests to OSS CI to catch the remaining issues, and fix some internal TARGETS dependency. Differential Revision: D63473744
) Summary: #136669 didn't resolve all the internal test failures. Add more tests to OSS CI to catch the remaining issues, and fix some internal TARGETS dependency. Differential Revision: D63473744 Pull Request resolved: #136775 Approved by: https://github.com/henrylhtsang
4 participants
Summary: When Inductor generates cpp kernels, they should be pure cpp loops which are independent to libtorch as much as possible.
Differential Revision: D63403473
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @ColinPeppler @amjames @chauhang