Skip to content

[inductor] Add kwargs to bypass unexpected keyword argument error #137329

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[inductor] Add kwargs to bypass unexpected keyword argument error #137329

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

henrylhtsang
Copy link
Contributor

@henrylhtsang henrylhtsang commented Oct 4, 2024 •
edited by pytorch-bot bot
Loading

Summary:
I tried TORCHINDUCTOR_PROFILE=1 TORCHINDUCTOR_PROFILE_OUTPUT=~/fbcode/profile.txt.

TypeError: DebugAutotuner.run() got an unexpected keyword argument 'benchmark_run'

Test Plan: ci

Differential Revision: D63876103

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @ColinPeppler @amjames @desertfire @chauhang

@henrylhtsang @facebook-github-bot
[inductor] Add kwargs to bypass unexpected keyword argument error
96648d7 
Summary:
I tried `TORCHINDUCTOR_PROFILE=1 TORCHINDUCTOR_PROFILE_OUTPUT=~/fbcode/profile.txt`.

TypeError: DebugAutotuner.run() got an unexpected keyword argument 'benchmark_run'

Test Plan: ci

Differential Revision: D63876103
@pytorch-bot PyTorch Bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/137329

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 96648d7 with merge base d326962 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63876103

@henrylhtsang henrylhtsang added the topic: not user facing topic category label Oct 4, 2024
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 4, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally'

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@muchulee8 muchulee8 muchulee8 approved these changes

@chenyang78 chenyang78 Awaiting requested review from chenyang78

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged module: inductor release notes: inductor topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@henrylhtsang @facebook-github-bot @pytorchmergebot @muchulee8