Skip to content

Conversation

@StrongerXi
Copy link
Contributor

@StrongerXi StrongerXi commented Dec 3, 2024

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Dec 3, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/142014

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit abf8368 with merge base c376b29 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

StrongerXi added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
This is no longer needed after #142000.

Fixes #123365.

ghstack-source-id: 776d8e0
Pull Request resolved: #142014
@StrongerXi StrongerXi added the topic: not user facing topic category label Dec 3, 2024
@StrongerXi StrongerXi requested a review from zou3519 December 4, 2024 15:39
if not torch._dynamo.is_compiling():
wrapper_fn = wraps(func)(wrapper_fn)

wrapper_fn = wraps(func)(wrapper_fn)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you put the wraps as a decorator on the wrapper_fn? i.e.

@wraps(func)
def wrapper_fn(...):
    ....

ditto below.

That's how the original code looked like before we did this hack

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah right, much cleaner, updated.

[ghstack-poisoned]
StrongerXi added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
This is no longer needed after #142000.

Fixes #123365.

ghstack-source-id: 9851f61
Pull Request resolved: #142014
@StrongerXi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Dec 4, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: HTTP Error 504: Gateway Timeout

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@StrongerXi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pobin6 pushed a commit to pobin6/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
@atalman
Copy link
Contributor

atalman commented Dec 5, 2024

@pytorchmergebot revert -c ghfirst -m "Sorry #142000 is failing internally, need to revert this"

@pytorch pytorch deleted a comment from pytorch-bot bot Dec 5, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@StrongerXi your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
…#142014)"

This reverts commit ed77901.

Reverted #142014 on behalf of https://github.com/atalman due to Sorry #142000 is failing internally, need to revert this ([comment](#142014 (comment)))
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator! Please try reimporting/rexporting the PR!

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@StrongerXi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -f "unrelated failures"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator! Please try reimporting/rexporting the PR!

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@izaitsevfb
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f "unrelated failures"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator! Please try reimporting/rexporting the PR!

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@izaitsevfb
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f "unrelated failures"

let's try one more time

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator! Please try reimporting/rexporting the PR!

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@izaitsevfb
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f "unrelated failures"

third time's a charm
(removed "Differential revision" from the second PR in the stack)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

AmdSampsa pushed a commit to AmdSampsa/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
AmdSampsa pushed a commit to AmdSampsa/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
…pytorch#142014)"

This reverts commit ed77901.

Reverted pytorch#142014 on behalf of https://github.com/atalman due to Sorry pytorch#142000 is failing internally, need to revert this ([comment](pytorch#142014 (comment)))
pytorch-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
This is no longer needed after #142000.

Fixes #123365.

D66838774
Pull Request resolved: #142014
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
ghstack dependencies: #142000
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/StrongerXi/52/head branch January 6, 2025 02:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged Reverted topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants