Skip to content

Conversation

@XuehaiPan
Copy link
Collaborator

@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan commented Jan 25, 2025

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 25, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/145685

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ No Failures, 49 Pending

As of commit d0bf0c9 with merge base 8b86844 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added ciflow/rocm Trigger "default" config CI on ROCm module: rocm AMD GPU support for Pytorch topic: not user facing topic category labels Jan 25, 2025
XuehaiPan added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2025
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 25, 2025 19:14 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 25, 2025 19:14 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 25, 2025 19:14 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 25, 2025 19:14 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 25, 2025 19:15 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 25, 2025 19:15 Inactive
@jeffdaily
Copy link
Collaborator

What exactly does this change do? I see it is changing rocm 6.2.4 --> 6.2, was that intentional?

[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2025
@XuehaiPan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

What exactly does this change do? I see it is changing rocm 6.2.4 --> 6.2, was that intentional?

Reverted. rocm6.2.4 and rocm6.2 points to the same URL.

[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit to XuehaiPan/pytorch that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit to XuehaiPan/pytorch that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan requested a review from a team as a code owner May 1, 2025 14:20
XuehaiPan added a commit to XuehaiPan/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit to XuehaiPan/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 16, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit to XuehaiPan/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 28, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit to XuehaiPan/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 31, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit to XuehaiPan/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2025
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan requested a review from jeffdaily June 9, 2025 18:10
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Starting merge as part of PR stack under #149143

[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit to XuehaiPan/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Starting merge as part of PR stack under #149143

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/XuehaiPan/239/head branch July 13, 2025 02:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/rocm Trigger "default" config CI on ROCm Merged module: rocm AMD GPU support for Pytorch open source topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants