Skip to content

Conversation

xmfan
Copy link
Member

@xmfan xmfan commented Mar 4, 2025

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 4, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/148491

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit 4175ba9 with merge base 097b0d3 (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
@xmfan xmfan marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2025 01:21
@xmfan xmfan requested a review from jamesjwu March 5, 2025 01:21
) # from compiled autograd
with self.assertRaisesRegex(
torch._dynamo.exc.BackendCompilerFailed,
"BypassAOTAutogradCache: Unsupported call_function target torch._dynamo.compiled_autograd.ops.validate_outputs",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

basic q: I would have imagined that the AOTAutograd cache misses, and is forced to re-run AOTAutograd on the ca graph. But in this test it sounds like compile hard errors duration compilation. Is that right / why is that the case?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep, we rerun AOTAutograd on the CA dynamo graph, it doesn't fail. Then we try to cache it, which fails because of some dynamically registered ops found in the CA dynamo graph. In this unit test, we set a config to make that a hard error

@xmfan
Copy link
Member Author

xmfan commented Mar 6, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -i

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Mar 6, 2025
@albanD albanD removed their request for review March 6, 2025 21:34
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged while ignoring the following 0 checks:

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@xmfan
Copy link
Member Author

xmfan commented Mar 7, 2025

@pytorchbot rebase

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here

[ghstack-poisoned]
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Successfully rebased gh/xmfan/191/orig onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict, please pull locally before adding more changes (for example, via ghstack checkout https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148491)

@xmfan
Copy link
Member Author

xmfan commented Mar 7, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator! Please try reimporting/rexporting the PR!

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

[ghstack-poisoned]
xmfan added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2025
@xmfan
Copy link
Member Author

xmfan commented Mar 8, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/xmfan/191/head branch April 12, 2025 02:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants