Refactor tests in test_max_autotune into a few separate test cases. #153486
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Summary: To support running a subset of these tests with the remote autotuning utilities, I've split out some of the tests into separate classes so that I can derive from the "main" TestMaxAutotune class when creating new tests for remote. I'm not 100% sure what some of these tests do, so please suggest if another grouping / naming might make more sense. The remaining tests in TestMaxAutotune all smelled relevant to me. Test Plan: existing unit tests [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/153486
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit 34beff7 with merge base f1de3f9 ( FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
masnesral
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2025
Summary: To support running a subset of these tests with the remote autotuning utilities, I've split out some of the tests into separate classes so that I can derive from the "main" TestMaxAutotune class when creating new tests for remote. I'm not 100% sure what some of these tests do, so please suggest if another grouping / naming might make more sense. The remaining tests in TestMaxAutotune all smelled relevant to me. Test Plan: existing unit tests ghstack-source-id: 6ec0286 Pull Request resolved: #153486
pytorch-bot
bot
added
ciflow/inductor
module: inductor
topic: not user facing
eellison
approved these changes
May 15, 2025
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Summary: To support running a subset of these tests with the remote autotuning utilities, I've split out some of the tests into separate classes so that I can derive from the "main" TestMaxAutotune class when creating new tests for remote. I'm not 100% sure what some of these tests do, so please suggest if another grouping / naming might make more sense. The remaining tests in TestMaxAutotune all smelled relevant to me.
Test Plan: existing unit tests
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @amjames @chauhang @aakhundov