Skip to content

Conversation

laithsakka
Copy link
Contributor

@laithsakka laithsakka commented May 28, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

This is just a refactor, not a fix for any issue.
we do check fallback_value first and early exit instead of checking it not set over and over.

cc @ezyang @SherlockNoMad @EikanWang @jgong5 @wenzhe-nrv

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 28, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/154493

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (3 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit 3aa8e3f with merge base 7359705 (image):

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: fx release notes category label May 28, 2025
@laithsakka laithsakka changed the title minor refactor check fall_back value first. May 28, 2025
cc ezyang SherlockNoMad EikanWang jgong5 wenzhe-nrv

[ghstack-poisoned]
@laithsakka laithsakka requested a review from bobrenjc93 as a code owner May 28, 2025 08:23
laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2025
ghstack-source-id: f626908
Pull Request resolved: #154493
@laithsakka laithsakka requested review from bobrenjc93 and removed request for bobrenjc93 May 28, 2025 08:24
@laithsakka laithsakka changed the title check fall_back value first. check fallback_value first. May 28, 2025
@laithsakka laithsakka added the topic: not user facing topic category label May 28, 2025
This is just a refactor, not a fix for any issue.
we do check fallback_value first  and early exit instead of checking it not set over and over.

cc ezyang SherlockNoMad EikanWang jgong5 wenzhe-nrv

[ghstack-poisoned]
laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
ghstack-source-id: dd9cec9
Pull Request resolved: #154493
@laithsakka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label May 29, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

iupaikov-amd pushed a commit to ROCm/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2025
This is just a refactor, not a fix for any issue.
we do check fallback_value first  and early exit instead of checking it not set over and over.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#154493
Approved by: https://github.com/bobrenjc93
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/laithsakka/197/head branch June 29, 2025 02:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fx Merged release notes: fx release notes category topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants