Skip to content

Conversation

fenypatel99
Copy link
Member

Summary: ^

Test Plan: CIs

Differential Revision: D75692171

Summary: ^

Test Plan: CIs

Differential Revision: D75692171
@fenypatel99 fenypatel99 requested a review from sraikund16 as a code owner May 30, 2025 17:17
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 30, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/154739

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit e7b5368 with merge base e7bf72c (image):

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D75692171

@fenypatel99
Copy link
Member Author

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label May 30, 2025
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label May 30, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

iupaikov-amd pushed a commit to ROCm/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2025
Summary: ^

Test Plan: CIs

Differential Revision: D75692171

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#154739
Approved by: https://github.com/sraikund16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants