Skip to content

Conversation

@ydwu4 ydwu4 requested a review from zou3519 as a code owner July 24, 2025 18:18
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jul 24, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/159063

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (9 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit 8326953 with merge base ee97dbf (image):

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but was present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@Lucaskabela
Copy link
Contributor

I am interested in a bit of context here since I have been working with example_values a bit lately - why do we want to stop setting them for these HOPs?

@ydwu4
Copy link
Contributor Author

ydwu4 commented Jul 24, 2025

These hops have their fake implementation so the example values can be auto-inferred when running fake implementation in wrap_fake

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Starting merge as part of PR stack under #159065

1 similar comment
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Starting merge as part of PR stack under #159065

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2025
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2025
yangw-dev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
yangw-dev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
yangw-dev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/ydwu4/297/head branch August 25, 2025 02:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants