Skip to content

Conversation

yuchengliu1
Copy link
Contributor

@yuchengliu1 yuchengliu1 commented Jul 31, 2025

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jul 31, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/159573

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit d7fca43 with merge base 78d7f0c (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@xuhancn xuhancn added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Aug 4, 2025
@xuhancn
Copy link
Collaborator

xuhancn commented Aug 4, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

markc-614 pushed a commit to markc-614/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
Operator `typeid` have different outputs in different compiler. There is a good example in [cppreference](https://www.en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/typeid.html).

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#159573
Approved by: https://github.com/angelayi, https://github.com/jansel
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants