Skip to content

Conversation

huydhn
Copy link
Contributor

@huydhn huydhn commented Aug 27, 2025

I made a mistake in #160935 removing this condition check. This ran the benchmark job twice for schedule jobs, i.e. https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/17266546494. This was missed during testing because pull_request and workflow_dispatch were working ok.

Signed-off-by: Huy Do <huydhn@gmail.com>
@huydhn huydhn requested a review from anijain2305 August 27, 2025 15:40
@huydhn huydhn requested a review from a team as a code owner August 27, 2025 15:40
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 27, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/161619

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ No Failures, 1 Pending

As of commit 9f71252 with merge base 9a12bab (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Aug 27, 2025
@huydhn
Copy link
Contributor Author

huydhn commented Aug 27, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -f 'CI only tweak, should be ok'

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

markc-614 pushed a commit to markc-614/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
I made a mistake in pytorch#160935 removing this condition check.  This ran the benchmark job twice for schedule jobs, i.e. https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/17266546494.  This was missed during testing because `pull_request` and `workflow_dispatch` were working ok.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#161619
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants