Skip to content

Conversation

exclamaforte
Copy link
Contributor

@exclamaforte exclamaforte commented Aug 27, 2025

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 27, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/161654

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 19b60d1 with merge base 443452c (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@exclamaforte exclamaforte added the topic: not user facing topic category label Aug 27, 2025
@exclamaforte exclamaforte requested a review from masnesral August 27, 2025 21:45
@exclamaforte exclamaforte changed the title clear feedback saver Select Algorithm clear feedback savers Aug 27, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@exclamaforte has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D81171481.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Aug 27, 2025
@exclamaforte
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@exclamaforte
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot rebase

@exclamaforte
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Successfully rebased exclamaforte/clear-feedback-savers onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict, please pull locally before adding more changes (for example, via git checkout exclamaforte/clear-feedback-savers && git pull --rebase)

@pytorchmergebot pytorchmergebot force-pushed the exclamaforte/clear-feedback-savers branch from 08cfd7b to 19b60d1 Compare August 28, 2025 00:38
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: Meta Internal-Only Changes Check

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@exclamaforte has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D81171481.

@exclamaforte
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

markc-614 pushed a commit to markc-614/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
Add `clear_feedback_savers` and tests for the feedback functionality.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#161654
Approved by: https://github.com/masnesral
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the exclamaforte/clear-feedback-savers branch September 28, 2025 02:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants