Skip to content

Conversation

pytorchupdatebot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is auto-generated nightly by this action.
Update the pinned xla hash.

@pytorchupdatebot pytorchupdatebot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2025 07:42
@pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR label Oct 6, 2025
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 6, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/164727

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit 4e3175c with merge base 2883b5a (image):

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added ciflow/inductor topic: not user facing topic category ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request labels Oct 6, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Chao1Han pushed a commit to Chao1Han/pytorch that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
This PR is auto-generated nightly by [this action](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/.github/workflows/nightly.yml).
Update the pinned xla hash.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#164727
Approved by: https://github.com/pytorchbot
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged open source topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants